Bug#609441: Opened additional bugs for each ALSA problem

Am 19.02.2011 22:25, schrieb Elimar Riesebieter: Be care ful deleting system files is /usr/share/. Of course - i just renamed it temporary. /usr/share/alsa/alsa.conf is installed unpatched as provided from upstream. It is just coming as original deployed from ALSA? Then it is reall

Re: Bug#609441: Opened additional bugs for each ALSA problem

* Karsten Malcher [110219 19:43 +0100]: [...] > >>Where and how is the alsa.conf generated? > >See and > >. > > That's interesting. > But when i rename the alsa.conf to alsa.conf.bak and try to restart ALSA, >

Processed: reopening 261150

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 261150 Bug #261150 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [xdm,gdm,kdm] default-x-display-manager asked at inflated priority 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions

Bug#609441: Opened additional bugs for each ALSA problem

Hi Lisandro, Seeing your reply in [0], it's seems it's not a phonon problem. Yes - that's saying everyone who has proved this bug, from the ALSA-Team and the father of phonon. But the Debian-Team has pushed it back to phonon. Having pulse libs installed is normal, even if you don't ha

Bug#261150: marked as done (default-x-display-manager asked at inflated priority)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:09:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#613491: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #261150, regarding default-x-display-manager asked at inflated priority to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#609441: Opened additional bugs for each ALSA problem

* Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [110219 13:10 -0300]: > On Saturday 19 February 2011 12:20:52 Karsten Malcher wrote: > > Because this bug is assigned to phonon by the ALSA-Team now, > > Seeing your reply in [0], it's seems it's not a phonon problem. > > [0]

Re: Bug#609441: Opened additional bugs for each ALSA problem

On Saturday 19 February 2011 12:20:52 Karsten Malcher wrote: > Because this bug is assigned to phonon by the ALSA-Team now, Seeing your reply in [0], it's seems it's not a phonon problem. [0] Elimar or someone else of the alsa team,

Bug#609441: Opened additional bugs for each ALSA problem

Because this bug is assigned to phonon by the ALSA-Team now, i have opened bugs in ALSA for the ALSA-problems for each soundchip: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614074 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614076 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=61407