Package: kde-full
Severity: normal
Tags: squeeze
Many times the shutdown button of the main kicker menu doesnt work.
I press and nothing appeaes.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2
Hi,
I have made the same test with qt version from nokia site from 4.5.3 to 4.6.3
and i have the same problem.
I think that the problem is not directly linked to Qt, but i don't know where
the problem is.
--
Ulrich Van Den Hekke
http://ulrich.vdh.free.fr
Empreinte : 2C60 9A57 39DF 48DE 6B95
The backtrace of the sigsegv:
#0 0x00406580 in strcmp ()
#1 0x77dec4bf in _dl_fixup (l=0x40107d, reloc_arg=) at ../elf/dl-runtime.c:148
#2 0x77df2415 in _dl_runtime_resolve () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/dl-
trampoline.S:41
#3 0x76bcdcc8 in qMetaTypeType_unlocked (typ
Hello,
On penktadienis 18 Birželis 2010 00:55:36 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> Il 17/06/2010 22:32, Sune Vuorela ha scritto:
> >> Yes, the discussion has gone very far off topic. The bug is that there
> >> is an unusable entry in my system menu.
> >
> > And, assuming you are not a KDE SC user, t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Python 2.6 is now default
> severity 539096 serious
Bug #539096 [elmerfem] elmerfem: FTBFS with python 2.6
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> severity 567942 serious
Bug #567942 [coccinelle] coccinelle: preparation for python 2.6 tran
Sorry, I forgot to post a copy to everybody...
Messaggio originale
Oggetto:Re: Bug#582844: unusable KNetAttach launcher
Data: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:51:32 +0200
Mittente: Carlo Stemberger
A: Modestas Vainius
Il 17/06/2010 21:53, Modestas Vainius ha scritto
Sorry, I forgot to post a copy to everybody...
Messaggio originale
Oggetto: Re: kdebase-runtime: Installs desktop entry for knetattach,
which is not installed
Data: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:47:48 +0200
Mittente: Carlo Stemberger
A: Sune Vuorela
Il 17/06/2010 22:3
On Thursday 17 June 2010 21:09:21 John Lindgren wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 01:09 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > KDE is bloated but that's hardly news. And it is offtopic for this bug
> > report and I believe there should be another one about this "issue".
>
> Yes, the discussion has gone very far off
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 20:24:13 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> Il 17/06/2010 19:12, Modestas Vainius ha scritto:
> > That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it.
>
> but it's not the same... a KDE user can start the program by clicking
> the icon; a * use
severity 582844 normal
thanks
Reverting to the original severity.
--John
On 06/17/2010 03:17 PM, John Lindgren wrote:
retitle 582844 kdebase-runtime: Desktop entry for knetattach is unusable
thanks
Next time, Carlo, please do not hijack others' bug reports for your own
wishlist items.
--John
retitle 582844 kdebase-runtime: Desktop entry for knetattach is unusable
thanks
Next time, Carlo, please do not hijack others' bug reports for your own
wishlist items.
--John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On 06/17/2010 01:09 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
KDE is bloated but that's hardly news. And it is offtopic for this bug report
and I believe there should be another one about this "issue".
Yes, the discussion has gone very far off topic. The bug is that there
is an unusable entry in my system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 582844 normal
Bug #582844 [kdebase-runtime] kdebase-runtime: Desktop entry for knetattach is
unusable
Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
582844: htt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 582844 kdebase-runtime: Desktop entry for knetattach is unusable
Bug #582844 [kdebase-runtime] kdebase-runtime: please split knetattach in a new
package
Changed Bug title to 'kdebase-runtime: Desktop entry for knetattach is
unusable' fro
Il 17/06/2010 19:12, Modestas Vainius ha scritto:
That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it.
but it's not the same... a KDE user can start the program by clicking
the icon; a * user has to type the full path into a terminal. Why this
discrimination?
And
your
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 14:32:53 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> PS.
> I don't like this solution because now a Gnome/XFCE/LXDE/... user can't
> use KNetAttach without patching the package.
That's wrong. Executable is simply not in PATH. Use full path to run it. And
your request is h
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 17 Birželis 2010 18:31:15 John Lindgren wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 08:09 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> >> Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
> >>> I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependenc
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdebase
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #547559 (http://bugs.debian.org/547559)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20801
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #583566 (http://bugs.debian.org/583566)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=236538
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdebase-workspace
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #292401 (http://bugs.debian.org/292401)
# * http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cg
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdebase
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdebase-workspace
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.aliot
On 06/17/2010 08:09 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I
don't use KDE
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 586030 konsole
Bug #586030 [pcmanfm] pcmanfm: opens Terminal in wrong folder
Bug reassigned from package 'pcmanfm' to 'konsole'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions pcmanfm/0.9.7-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
On Thursday, 2010-06-17, Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> Il 17/06/2010 14:09, Sune Vuorela ha scritto:
> > Just to be sure, you want a 52kb executable split out because you don't
> > want it around
>
> Mmm... yes :D
>
> For me it's not important the program size, while the cleanness.
Just to get this
Il 17/06/2010 14:09, Sune Vuorela ha scritto:
Just to be sure, you want a 52kb executable split out because you don't want
it around
Mmm... yes :D
For me it's not important the program size, while the cleanness.
--
.' `. | Registered Linux User #443882
|a_a | | http://counter.li.o
On Thursday 17 June 2010 13:30:00 Carlo Stemberger wrote:
> Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
> > I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
> > code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I
> > don't use KDE. :)
>
> I agree... Why programs
PS.
I don't like this solution because now a Gnome/XFCE/LXDE/... user can't
use KNetAttach without patching the package.
--
.' `. | Registered Linux User #443882
|a_a | | http://counter.li.org/ .''`.
\<_)__/ +--- : :' :
/(
Il 16/06/2010 16:19, John Lindgren ha scritto:
I still think KNetAttach should not be needed as a dependency of a
code profiling program such as KCachegrind, but hey, that's why I
don't use KDE. :)
I agree... Why programs as KHangMan or KTuberling need KNetAttach?
I don't like this solution
30 matches
Mail list logo
