Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:34:23PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not > > important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical, > > regar

Bug#337764: libqt4-debug: Building apps in debug mode breaks image loading

2005-11-25 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 18.11.05 13:44:29, Brian Nelson wrote: > Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 18.11.05 10:20:54, Brian Nelson wrote: > >> Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Building QT4 apps using > >> > > >> > CONFIG += debug > >> > > >> > breaks the loading of any icons in

Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:57:17PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > * Robert Millan [Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100]: > > > Well, that's not the problem. If the application needs unrar to extract rar > > archives, then suggesting unrar is ok [1]. It's the fact that the > > application > > suppor

Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Robert Millan [Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100]: > Well, that's not the problem. If the application needs unrar to extract rar > archives, then suggesting unrar is ok [1]. It's the fact that the application > supports creating rar archives that I believe violates the DFSG. > Does this explana

Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not > important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical, > regardless of what's being suggested, Hi Steve, My concern is about the

Bug#340704: marked as done (rar support violates DFSG #4)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:56:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Re: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 340704 important Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4 Severity set to `important'. > severity 340705 important Bug#340705: rar support violates DFSG #4 Severity set to `important'. > severity 340706 important Bug#340706: rar support viola

Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 340704 important severity 340705 important severity 340706 important severity 340707 important thanks Hi Robert, Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical, regardless of what's be

Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4

2005-11-25 Thread Robert Millan
Package: ark Severity: serious Justification: DFSG #4 This package has a "Suggests: rar" tag. If it has the functionality to create rar archives via rar, this is a serious problem, because it is encouraging users to create "trap archives" that can't be extracted with free software. I believe thi