On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:34:23PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not
> > important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical,
> > regar
On 18.11.05 13:44:29, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 18.11.05 10:20:54, Brian Nelson wrote:
> >> Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Building QT4 apps using
> >> >
> >> > CONFIG += debug
> >> >
> >> > breaks the loading of any icons in
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:57:17PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Robert Millan [Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100]:
>
> > Well, that's not the problem. If the application needs unrar to extract rar
> > archives, then suggesting unrar is ok [1]. It's the fact that the
> > application
> > suppor
* Robert Millan [Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:34:23 +0100]:
> Well, that's not the problem. If the application needs unrar to extract rar
> archives, then suggesting unrar is ok [1]. It's the fact that the application
> supports creating rar archives that I believe violates the DFSG.
> Does this explana
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not
> important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical,
> regardless of what's being suggested,
Hi Steve,
My concern is about the
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:56:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 340704 important
Bug#340704: rar support violates DFSG #4
Severity set to `important'.
> severity 340705 important
Bug#340705: rar support violates DFSG #4
Severity set to `important'.
> severity 340706 important
Bug#340706: rar support viola
severity 340704 important
severity 340705 important
severity 340706 important
severity 340707 important
thanks
Hi Robert,
Sorry, I have to disagree with these bug severities; Suggests: are just not
important enough in our packaging system to treat them as release-critical,
regardless of what's be
Package: ark
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG #4
This package has a "Suggests: rar" tag. If it has the functionality to create
rar archives via rar, this is a serious problem, because it is encouraging users
to create "trap archives" that can't be extracted with free software. I believe
thi
9 matches
Mail list logo