Package: kdvi
Version: 4:3.2.2-1
Severity: minor
kdvi outputs the following warning to the shell on execution:
kdecore (KAction): WARNING: KAction::insertKAccel( kaccel = 0x80671f0 ):
KAccel object already contains an action name "help_whats_this"
This warning does not impede basic functio
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
knode_3.3.0-1_i386.deb: package says section is news, override says net.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong p
Accepted:
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
karm_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.3.0-1_i38
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264825: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254643: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209997: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209672: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209689: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209862: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210088: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#210094: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266311: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266603: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:47:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#266603: fixed in kdepim 4:3.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
kdepim_3.3.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kdepim_3.3.0-1.dsc
kdepim_3.3.0.orig.tar.gz
kdepim_3.3.0-1.diff.gz
kdepim_3.3.0-1_all.deb
kdepim-doc_3.3.0-1_all.deb
kdepim-doc-html_3.3.0-1_all.deb
kdepim-dev_3.3.0-1_i386.deb
kaddressbook_3.3.0-1_
CVS commit by habouzit:
opml doenst exist anymore
M +0 -1 akregator.install 1.5
--- kdenonbeta/akregator/debian/akregator.install #1.4:1.5
@@ -7,5 +7,4 @@
debian/tmp/usr/share/applnk/Internet/akregator.desktop
debian/tmp/usr/share/services/akregator_part.desktop
-debian/tmp/usr/sh
CVS commit by habouzit:
debian thinkgs for beta6
M +3 -2 changelog 1.26
M +2 -2 copyright 1.4
--- kdenonbeta/akregator/debian/changelog #1.25:1.26
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
-akregator (1.0-beta5-3) unstable; urgency=low
+akregator (1.0-beta6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Add debian
Package: kdm
Version: 4:3.3.0-1
kdm does not allow login for ldap users. I tried using the stock
/etc/pam.d/kdm configuration without modification, and that has not
worked. I've got the appropriate pam_ldap.so entries in my
/etc/pam.d/common-* files to allow ldap authentication, and ldap
authentic
Hi.
> Tags: security upstream sarge
Since tiff4 has (just) now moved into sarge, either calc or I will be
uploading fixes for this (and the other recently announced KDE security
issues) to testing-proposed-updates, hopefully tomorrow.
Ben.
Package: konqueror
Version: 3.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream sarge
Web sites operating under the affected domains can set HTTP
cookies in such a way that the Konqueror web browser will send them
to all other web sites operating under the same domain.
I don't have the probleme anymore with 3.3 now.
IMO, the bug should be closed.
Regards,
Gonéri
Package: kdelibs4
Version: 4:3.3.0
Hi all,
When updating my unstable system I get the following message:
"kdelibs4: Hängt ab: libopenexr0 (>= 1.1.1), welches ein virtuelles
Paket ist."
Trying to install libopenexr0 gives the following message:
Kein Kandidat für »libopenexr0« gefunden.
Becaus
Hello,
I have observed this bug on two different i386 Debian "unstable"
systems, one a new HP system where Xfree86 uses the Intel "i810" driver,
the other one a rather old Dell system using the "ati" driver.
The systems are quite dead in both cases; they respond to "ping",
but neit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 25 Août 2004 08:40, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> Any news about this bug? Plans for fixing, recommendations for
> workaround (mine was picking the file from the 3.2.2 release of kdm
> and replacing Xsession with it)
>
> I had hard times tr
tags 267232 sid
thanks
This bug does indeed appear to be specific to sid.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Any news about this bug? Plans for fixing, recommendations for
workaround (mine was picking the file from the 3.2.2 release of kdm
and replacing Xsession with it)
I had hard times trying to figure out why the hell my ssh-agent did
not start anymore : I'm not a Xsession thing guru and the change w
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 267232 sid
Bug#267232: kaddressbook: Does not start, even though GUI appears
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
27 matches
Mail list logo
