Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 137658 + l10n
Bug#137658: russian debconf template file for htdig package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: l10n
> tags 225824 + l10n
Bug#225824: Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: l10n
> tags 207727 +
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:39:12PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> >kdelibs
> >---
> >m68k - failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
> >mips - failed - ICE #226727
>
> Please try to find a workaround for this ICE (or help find & fix it).
> The GCC developers haven'
CVS commit by eva:
answered some questions, that kurt added to the file
M +12 -2 might_be_removed 1.4
--- kdenonbeta/kdedebian/livecd/packagelist/might_be_removed #1.3:1.4
@@ -4,4 +4,6 @@
dirmngr
dhcp # WHY? (is there a replacement?)
+ this is the
Package: kmix
Version: 4:3.1.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Kmix 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 show ridiculous volume levels until the volume is manually
adjusted. See KDE bug #64274. This was fixed upstream on 11/24/03 but won't
be available until KDE 3.2
It's a very simple fix, so I attached a patch. A
Chris Cheney wrote:
kdelibs
---
m68k- failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
mips- failed - ICE #226727
Please try to find a workaround for this ICE (or help find & fix it).
The GCC developers haven't tracked it down yet, which means it may well
not be fixed by sarge release
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:15:55 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in kdelibs 3.1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
CVS commit by mornfall:
- oops, mixed up files a bit
- also, move one of the TODO items to a later version
Akapture/kaptureview.h 1.1 [no copyright]
M +5 -5 TODO 1.6
Rkapture/kaptureiface.h 1.1
--- kdenonbeta/kdedebian/kapture/TODO #1.5:1.6
@@ -62,9 +
CVS commit by mornfall:
- update TODO (domi: please read, maybe adjust)
- fix qextmdi.diff (you'll need to reapply)
- create initial kmdi interface
- implemented PkgGrouperChain: this encapsulates a chain of
PkgGrouperFactory's, or of PkgGrouperChain's. This allows for building trees
of PkgGr
ark_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/ark_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kcalc_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kcalc_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kcharselect_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kcharselect_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kdepasswd_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdeutils/kdepasswd_3.1.5-1_i386
kdeutils_3.1.5-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kdeutils_3.1.5-1.dsc
kdeutils_3.1.5.orig.tar.gz
kdeutils_3.1.5-1.diff.gz
ark_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kcalc_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kcharselect_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kdepasswd_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kdessh_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
Package: kate
Version: 4:3.1.5-1
Severity: important
Don't forget to change the Recommends: libkregexpeditor to
kregexpeditor.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux calc 2.6.0-mm1 #1 SMP Thu Dec 25 17:43:51 CST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8,
Accepted:
kaddressbook_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kaddressbook_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kalarm_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/kandy_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
karm_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdepim/karm_3.1.5-1_i38
kdepim_3.1.5-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kdepim_3.1.5-1.dsc
kdepim_3.1.5.orig.tar.gz
kdepim_3.1.5-1.diff.gz
kdepim-dev_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kaddressbook_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kalarm_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kandy_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
karm_3.1.5-1_i386.deb
kd
CVS commit by juanjux:
TODO
M +2 -2 TODO 1.4
--- kdenonbeta/kdedebian/kalternatives/TODO #1.3:1.4
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-* KDE Support (KUniqueApp, Exit confirm dialog, etc)
+* KDE Support (KUniqueApp, Exit confirm dialog, .desktop file, etc)
* Buttons with icons, where configured
-* Abo
CVS commit by juanjux:
More TODO modification
M +1 -1 TODO 1.3
--- kdenonbeta/kdedebian/kalternatives/TODO #1.2:1.3
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
* KDE Support (KUniqueApp, Exit confirm dialog, etc)
* Buttons with icons, where configured
-* About, Help and tooltips
+* About, Help and tooltips (
CVS commit by juanjux:
Changed the TODO (the sys.exit problem is already fixed)
M +0 -1 TODO 1.2
--- kdenonbeta/kdedebian/kalternatives/TODO #1.1.1.1:1.2
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-* sys.exit(0) doesn't seems to work here, change it
* KDE Support (KUniqueApp, Exit confirm dialog, etc)
* But
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:18:26 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The package description does not follow Debian policy
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
It appears m68k will be holding up KDE as usual. It still has not built
qt-x11-free even though it was uploaded on Jan 6. Which means it can't
build the rest of KDE until it does.
Thanks,
Chris
arts
m68k- failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
kdeaddons
-
not uploaded ye
32 matches
Mail list logo
