> Infact, points 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 were included not only for but
> especially for you -- you complained about "feeling unhappy with
> justifying all changes you do to others".
Sure. I like points 2.4 - 2.7. I'm simply asking how it's better than the
current system (which is working fine fo
The current[1] status of KDE in sid is below. I noticed some of the
packages are being SKIPPED on m68k, why is that? Hopefully the buildds
will retry the packages that failed due to libxft2-dev soon.
Chris Cheney
[1] - Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:49:42 -0500
arts
---
Done.
Needs reorganization of liba
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:39:48AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> I think the biggest inconvenience I forsee is with the BTS - I'd have to
> start keeping track of multiple maintainer email addresses, and it will
> be more difficult to track the bugs in the packages that I'm looking
> after amongst the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:39:48AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> > whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> > in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> >
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:17:47AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> > whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> > in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> >
> Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> us know that too?
Further to my previous email: My second question
> Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
> whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be changed
> in their opinion? And can those who do not have any objections please let
> us know that too?
Hmm, my first question is why we'd be using alioth
Hi folks,
I prepared a policy for the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group, the document
can be found at http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
Can you (esp. the people mentioned as "base members") read it and tell us
whether they want to lodge objections and if so what needs to be
8 matches
Mail list logo
