Re: qt3-examples building

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Dienstag, 2. September 2003 00:28, Ralf Nolden wrote: > Hi, > > I've done a test build and have found that building the examples now works > Ok though TrollTech has some bugs remaining in the code wrt qwindowsstyle.h > includes in examples/demo/main.cpp and examples/themes/wood.h and metal.h. >

qt3-examples building

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
Hi, I've done a test build and have found that building the examples now works Ok though TrollTech has some bugs remaining in the code wrt qwindowsstyle.h includes in examples/demo/main.cpp and examples/themes/wood.h and metal.h. However, it compiles fine if libqt3-plugins-headers are installed

Re: qt-copy/debian updated

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Montag, 1. September 2003 19:03, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote: > On September 01, 2003 12:56, Ralf Nolden wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I merged in the -3.diff.gz from incoming.debian.org now plus fixed up the > > patches for the libtool and qlineedit patches from qt-copy. Martin will > > upload this

Re: CVS commit messages (Was: qt-copy/debian updated)

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Montag, 1. September 2003 20:03, David Pashley wrote: > On Sep 01, 2003 at 17:56, Ralf Nolden praised the llamas by saying: > Content-Description: signed data > > > Hi, > > > > I merged in the -3.diff.gz from incoming.debian.org now plus fixed up the > > patches for the libtool and qlineedit pat

CVS commit messages (Was: qt-copy/debian updated)

2003-09-01 Thread David Pashley
On Sep 01, 2003 at 17:56, Ralf Nolden praised the llamas by saying: Content-Description: signed data > Hi, > > I merged in the -3.diff.gz from incoming.debian.org now plus fixed up the > patches for the libtool and qlineedit patches from qt-copy. Martin will > upload this as 3.2.1-4 later. If yo

Re: qt-copy/debian updated

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Montag, 1. September 2003 19:03, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote: > On September 01, 2003 12:56, Ralf Nolden wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I merged in the -3.diff.gz from incoming.debian.org now plus fixed up the > > patches for the libtool and qlineedit patches from qt-copy. Martin will > > upload this

Re: qt-copy/debian updated

2003-09-01 Thread James Michael Greenhalgh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On September 01, 2003 12:56, Ralf Nolden wrote: > Hi, > > I merged in the -3.diff.gz from incoming.debian.org now plus fixed up the > patches for the libtool and qlineedit patches from qt-copy. Martin will > upload this as 3.2.1-4 later. If you want, y

qt-copy/debian updated

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
Hi, I merged in the -3.diff.gz from incoming.debian.org now plus fixed up the patches for the libtool and qlineedit patches from qt-copy. Martin will upload this as 3.2.1-4 later. If you want, you can test it by grabbing the orig.tar.gz from incoming or unstable's qt-x11-free and check out qt-c

Re: Uploading koffice-i18n

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Montag, 1. September 2003 16:09, Ben Burton wrote: > > It wouldn't have harmed anyone but I think it doesn't make much sense > > either - you don't have one for kde-i18n also. > > Which of course is not a particularly strong reason of itself. > > Anyway, I personally don't care too much whether

Re: Uploading koffice-i18n

2003-09-01 Thread Ben Burton
> It wouldn't have harmed anyone but I think it doesn't make much sense > either - you don't have one for kde-i18n also. Which of course is not a particularly strong reason of itself. Anyway, I personally don't care too much whether the metapackage exists or not - I'm mainly arguing against what

Re: Uploading koffice-i18n

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Montag, 1. September 2003 15:17, Ben Burton wrote: > > Ugh, why do you want to introduce a metapackage ? Is there a reason > > for that ? kde-i18n doesn't have nor need one either :-) > > The reason for suggesting it was for the sort of people who would > traditionally download koffice-i18n fro

Re: Uploading koffice-i18n

2003-09-01 Thread Ben Burton
> Ugh, why do you want to introduce a metapackage ? Is there a reason > for that ? kde-i18n doesn't have nor need one either :-) The reason for suggesting it was for the sort of people who would traditionally download koffice-i18n from the KDE servers and build and install it. As I see it, if y

Re: Uploading koffice-i18n

2003-09-01 Thread Ralf Nolden
On Montag, 1. September 2003 04:01, Ben Burton wrote: > Hi. I'm preparing a koffice-i18n upload ATM so we can get it into sarge > before things start to freeze. > > Based on the latest discussion regarding package splitting with > kde-i18n, my initial plan is to simply upload 30 different > koffic