Lars Wirzenius writes:
> On pe, 2010-08-20 at 14:55 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Now, I've no idea if the above would be appropriate for the upstream
> > front desk or not. I leave it up to you to decide whether it's worth
> > trying or not.
>
> I think a debian-upstre...@lists.debian.org
Jan Dittberner writes:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 02:57:12PM +0200, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> > On 07/02/2010 11:14 PM, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > >Am I the only one who has trouble -and getting laughed at- whenever I
> > >try to explain these to potential contributors?
> > >
> > >Can we _at least_
> Steve McIntyre writes:
> > 4 Marketing stuff:
> >a box(es) of equipment to take to stands at various shows and
> > expos. Might be useful, but could be expensive. Where do we store
> > it/them? Who organises shipping?
>
> I think this is something which we should pursue. I genera
Quoting "Александр Боровский" :
здравствуйте вы не моглибы прислать мне список оранизаций
которыерабоаютна linux debian
translating from russian:
Hello, could you please send me a list of organizations using Debian?
the answer is:
http://www.debian.org/users/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Hi,
> Every organisation can only survive (or grow) with a constant stream of
> fresh members.
This is obviously true.
> So please dear Debian Developers: Go to http://mentors.debian.net! There
> are people willing to get involved in Debian. But some of them might be in
> danger to get frustrate
> On Wed, Jul 29 2009, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Sune Vuorela (nos...@vuorela.dk) wrote:
> >> I'm hoping that we can convince the release team to change their mind.
> >
> > I doubt you can, and I hope you don't. It could have been announced
> > better, but in general I think it's a good thing for
> On Tue Jun 23 11:30, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > - the NM process could be reduced to 5 to 10 questions choosen by the
> >AM amongst the 50+ questions currently in the NM templates, to verify
> > that the applicant has some knowledge about different aspects of Debian
> > packaging. Then the AM
On Monday 05 January 2009 12:17:42 MJ Ray wrote:
--cut--
> There are already crude mechanisms (reply privately, reply publicly,
> report abuse and so on) but they are social more than technical.
Agruably, these mechanisms don't reveal the big picture to the society (i.e.
what people think about s
On Monday 22 December 2008 07:47:41 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> So, are there going to be guide;lines for this voting on emails?
I'm afraid that I'm not able answer such a question, but I can try to provide
a contra-argument (just to prove it wrong or maybe right) -- if we follo
On Sunday 21 December 2008 23:12:08 Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:35:14AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > Now, I know that for a bunch of geeks like us it is very tempting to
> > start discussing the technical details and how the scoring is
> > going to be implemented, and how t
On Sunday 21 December 2008 20:28:18 Okan Demir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm an engineering student from Turkey. I started to use Debian (Etch)
> nearly one year ago. I think this period is enough to be a fan of
> Debian. From now on i'm a Debian user.
> But being a user, does not satisfy my Debian based
On Sunday 21 December 2008 03:49:44 Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:35:14AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > * "Vocal minority" dominates "silent majority" by contributing a
> > disproportionate amount of list traffic, [...]
>
> Note that voting can have a similar drawback -- in tha
On Saturday 20 December 2008 21:33:27 MJ Ray wrote:
> Jurij Smakov wrote: [...]
>
> > So, what can we do about? During a little brainstorming session on IRC
> > last night a following idea has emerged: let's have a way to express
> > our opinion about the mailing list posts. [...]
>
> So, people w
On Friday 05 December 2008 23:34:41 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-12-06 01:58:59, schrieb Chris Bannister:
> > > Note: I employ only women (IT and Electronic)
> >
> > And so is that!
> >
> > Both illegal in New Zealand and hopefully, nearly(?) all other
> > countries.
>
> Even if it is a proje
On Monday 01 December 2008 15:42:20 Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:05:07PM +, Mark Brown a écrit :
> > FWIW similar issues apply in most of Europe too.
>
> Thank you for the information. For Antartica, the situation of
> discrimination has rapidly and positively evolved and
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > In this particular case, the problem is much worse than just a single
> > bug in a package - it's a total failure in the sponsorship
> > system.
>
> From what Ramakrishnan and other sponsors wrote on this thread, it
> sounds l
On Monday 09 April 2007 19:39, val wrote:
> Вы слишком много расхваливаете debian, но все кто хочет попытаться не то
> что работать, а только установить что-нибудь из linux, постоянно
> сталкивается с проблемой установки, вы что не знаете что большинство
> жёстких дисков сейчас работает на sata, а
On Saturday 24 March 2007 19:53, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - the fact that other Debian maintainers does not try to
> > > find a workaround for the problems caused by some outcasts
> > > causes damage to the reputation of the Debian project.
>
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:18, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > > It's not Dunc Tank's fault if your jealous.
> > >
> > > Hmm, maybe it is because the developer is jealous on/of somebody
> > > being directly or indirectly paid by the project while they are
> > > not?
> >
> >
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 13:09, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 September 2006 04:16, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Paul Belanger wrote:
> > > After all, the point of any distribution is to sell it to a user.
> >
> > It is not. For example, Debian Developers usually don't care how many
> > users
On Saturday 02 September 2006 02:41, Russ Allbery wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reason I am pushing for this is because of two of my clients, who
> > have been wanting to use Debian for three years now but consciously
> > decided against it, because it is not guarante
On Monday 31 July 2006 19:46, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Hubert Chan dijo [Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:30:06AM -0400]:
> > > I meant with group of maintainers, number of uploaders > 1. Joerg
> > > Jaspert said that he wouldn't like to be forced to team maintenance
> > > and suggested 0day NMUs for >= normal
On Sunday 30 July 2006 13:24, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:57:32PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > So, that's a clear example where the team maintenance can be as useless
> > as letting only one people ma
On Saturday 29 July 2006 09:48, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Co-maintainers are much closer to what is being done in a package
> > > than joe-random developer. Also, co-maintainership is far less
> > > prone to fire-and-forget uploads that hose things, and are nicer to
> >
On Saturday 08 July 2006 12:20, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> Also, they had some engine for package comparison and search (where the
> weather was one of the side spin-offs from it). This could help us to
> ask more question about package aspects, and they are waiting for inputs
> from us
On Sunday 11 June 2006 21:50, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You are crazy, and should get yourself some professional psychiatric
> counceling.
I fully agree that this creature [1] has some kind of mental problems, thus
trying to keep any sort of normal conversaton with such sort of interlocutors
is d
On Saturday 10 June 2006 19:01, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.10.1748 +0200]:
> > > yahoo reported to have killed the account to me this morning.
> >
> > Funny, when I forwarded the email to abuse@ last night, they replied:
> >
> > Please k
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 16:14, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:29:56PM +0300, Panu Kalliokoski wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 10:15:20PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > > Besides, there is no value in a wide-open voting system. This is
> > > called an "Internet poll" a
On Saturday 15 April 2006 17:48, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
--cut--
> > We'll never tell that! We just tell "we trust you to maintain
> > according to our standards but since you didn't went (yet) through
> > full NM, we don't trust you on working on anything you'd want".
>
> Err, I am not su
29 matches
Mail list logo
