Hi!
On 2014-11-14 at 07:41 (CET), Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
> I just feel the need to express my deep thanks to all your work in
> Debian specifically in the endless systemd debate. While I'm personally
> very neutral and just expect my computer to boot (which it does with
> systemd) I r
Hi Russ,
I just feel the need to express my deep thanks to all your work in
Debian specifically in the endless systemd debate. While I'm personally
very neutral and just expect my computer to boot (which it does with
systemd) I really appreciate all your sensible and always patient mails
on the m
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Ian Jackson dijo [Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:53:30PM +]:
The correct reaction to people not adopting your software is to make
your software better, not to conduct an aggressive marketing campaign
aimed at persuading upstreams to built it in as a dependency, nor to
overrun dis
Ian Jackson dijo [Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:53:30PM +]:
> The correct reaction to people not adopting your software is to make
> your software better, not to conduct an aggressive marketing campaign
> aimed at persuading upstreams to built it in as a dependency, nor to
> overrun distro mailing li
On 11/13/2014 at 12:29 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:53:30PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
>> The correct reaction to people not adopting your software is to
>> make your software better, not to conduct an aggressive marketing
>> campaign aimed at persuading upstreams to buil
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Apologies for the debian-boston-soc mailing list going away. I changed
> infrastructure a couple of years ago and it made it a bit more difficult
> to host mailing lists.
> I'd be happy if someone else wanted to run a Debian Boston mailing lis
Sam Hartman wrote:
Apologies for the debian-boston-soc mailing list going away. I changed
infrastructure a couple of years ago and it made it a bit more difficult
to host mailing lists.
I'd be happy if someone else wanted to run a Debian Boston mailing list,
and I'd be willing to make the effort
Hi Brian,
On 13.11.2014 23:43, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I'll show them some identification to prove I'm
> a Brian Michael Nelson which, since the other Brian Michael Nelson in
> the project retired, means I'm probably the one still active. I'll be
> able to submit a stronger key, but what exactly ha
Gunnar Wolf writes:
> Brian Nelson dijo [Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:27:59PM -0500]:
>> Well I have a new key but it doesn't have any signatures on it other
>> than my own, and I haven't encountered another developer in years to
>> have it signed. I've been listed on
>> https://wiki.debian.org/Keysi
Brian Nelson dijo [Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 02:27:59PM -0500]:
> Well I have a new key but it doesn't have any signatures on it other
> than my own, and I haven't encountered another developer in years to
> have it signed. I've been listed on
> https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers for years (two
Apologies for the debian-boston-soc mailing list going away. I changed
infrastructure a couple of years ago and it made it a bit more difficult
to host mailing lists.
I'd be happy if someone else wanted to run a Debian Boston mailing list,
and I'd be willing to make the effort to bring the list ba
Gunnar Wolf writes:
> Brian Nelson dijo [Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:09:02PM -0500]:
>> >> Wouldn't it make more sense to ask these people privately what is getting
>> >> in
>> >> the way of a switch to a stronger key?
>> >
>> > They have been asked. Repeatedly.
>>
>> I haven't been asked. I've re
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 05:32:34PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Could you please keep this whole mess on the mailing lists where it
> > came from? I (and I believe others) have unsubscribed from -devel and
> > -vote because we were fed up with the endless debate around the whole
> > systemd issue.
Ian Jackson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Being part of a community and behaving"):
>> We waited two years, during which positions hardened, people got
>> angrier and angrier, and there were increasing demands to force the
>> issue. Serious question: how much longer were we realistically g
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:53:30PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The correct reaction to people not adopting your software is to make
> your software better, not to conduct an aggressive marketing campaign
> aimed at persuading upstreams to built it in as a dependency, nor to
> overrun distro mailing
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:33:28PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> AIUI, you need to have at least one(?) additional signature on your new
> 2048+ RSA key on top of your old DSA key, correct?
I meant "on top of the signature from your old DSA key".
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-pro
Ian Jackson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Being part of a community and behaving"):
>> We waited two years, during which positions hardened, people got angrier
>> and angrier, and there were increasing demands to force the issue.
>> Serious question: how much longer were we realistically go
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 02:35:55PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh dijo [Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:11:14PM -0200]:
> > On Sat, 08 Nov 2014, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > > Interpretation is in the eye of the bee holder, but I am considering
> > > to attach this list to my weekly
Simon Chopin writes ("Re: Being part of a community and behaving"):
> Could you please keep this whole mess on the mailing lists where it
> came from? I (and I believe others) have unsubscribed from -devel and
> -vote because we were fed up with the endless debate around the whole
> systemd issue.
Hi,
Could you please keep this whole mess on the mailing lists where it
came from? I (and I believe others) have unsubscribed from -devel and
-vote because we were fed up with the endless debate around the whole
systemd issue. Please don't make us also unsubscribe from -project ?
Cheers,
Simon
Q
Hi Ian,
On Donnerstag, 13. November 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The correct reaction to people not adopting your software is to make
> your software better, not to conduct an aggressive marketing campaign
> aimed at persuading upstreams to built it in as a dependency, nor to
> overrun distro mailin
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Being part of a community and behaving"):
> We waited two years, during which positions hardened, people got angrier
> and angrier, and there were increasing demands to force the issue.
> Serious question: how much longer were we realistically going to wait with
> zero sig
Hi,
Brian Nelson:
> >> Wouldn't it make more sense to ask these people privately what is getting
> >> in
> >> the way of a switch to a stronger key?
> >
> > They have been asked. Repeatedly.
>
> I haven't been asked. I've received a few reminders that I need a new
> key with signatures, but I h
23 matches
Mail list logo
