Bug#177438: Update build-dependency to bison package instead of bison-1.35

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-7 Severity: wishlist Could the build-dependency to bison package? That's to avoid so many times the same things repeated, having bison and bison-1.35 at the same time. Thank you for your great work Asier Llano -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/

Bug#177438: Update build-dependency to bison package instead of bison-1.35

Hi, tag 177438 pending thanks Asier Llano Palacios wrote: > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 1.0.1-7 > Severity: wishlist > > Could the build-dependency to bison package? > That's to avoid so many times the same things repeated, > having bison and bison-1.35 at the same time. This change is p

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by rene

Repository: oo-deb/debian who:rene time: Sun Jan 19 16:27:09 UTC 2003 Log Message: close the "I want a build-dependency on ony bison" wishlist bug in changelog Files: changed:changelog

cvs commit to oo-deb/debian by rene

Repository: oo-deb/debian who:rene time: Sun Jan 19 16:29:26 UTC 2003 Log Message: fix typo: s/bsion/bison/ Files: changed:changelog

Processed: Re: Bug#177438: Update build-dependency to bison package instead of bison-1.35

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hi, Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > tag 177438 pending Bug#177438: Update build-dependency to bison package instead of bison-1.35 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#177453: Building with g++ instead of g++-3.2

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-7 Severity: wishlist Currently the openoffice builds with g++-3.2 (the part that I've seen). Now that sid has g++-3.2 as the default g++ compiler, Could it be updated to use g++ directly instead of g++-3.2? The reasons are: - If a g++-3.3 you could get bene