Re: g++-3.2 transition of the stlport package

2003-02-11 Thread Chris Halls
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:35:35AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > No, libstlport4.5-dev does not contain any library---only the STL > headers and an empty libstlport.a for developers who are not able to > delete -lstlport in their Makefile. It is all explained in > README.Debian. Aaah! OK, I fai

Re: g++-3.2 transition of the stlport package

2003-02-11 Thread Torsten Werner
On 2003-02-11, Chris Halls wrote: > $ dpkg -L libstlport4.5-dev | grep libstlport > /usr/lib/libstlport.a > /usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.a > /usr/share/doc/libstlport4.5-dev > > Would it not make sense to include the libstlport[_gcc].so symlinks, in > the same way as they are available in libstlport4.5

Re: g++-3.2 transition of the stlport package

2003-02-11 Thread Chris Halls
Hi Torsen, Thanks for your notification of the stlport transition. I'm wondering about the libstlport4.5-dev package: $ dpkg -L libstlport4.5-dev | grep libstlport /usr/lib/libstlport.a /usr/lib/libstlport_gcc.a /usr/share/doc/libstlport4.5-dev Would it not make sense to include the libstlport[

Re: g++-3.2 transition of the stlport package

2003-01-09 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Morning Torsten ... On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:10:44AM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: >It is done now. Please Cc: your replies on the mailing list to me. I think I will test it after the next package (new release perhaps) ... Thnx very much :) regards Jan

g++-3.2 transition of the stlport package

2003-01-09 Thread Torsten Werner
It is done now. Please Cc: your replies on the mailing list to me. Torsten -- Torsten Werner Dresden University of Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 351 46336711 / +49 162 3123004 http://www.twerner42.de/ telefax: +49 351 46336809 --