Re: building OOo1.1...

2003-07-14 Thread Chris Halls
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 11:51:58AM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > > You shouldn't have to backport anything at all - the only special version > > you need is the debhelper 4.0.2.openoffice that contains a single bugfix for > > a problem in Woody, and that is available from the debian-openoffice

Re: building OOo1.1...

2003-07-14 Thread Jérôme Warnier
> You shouldn't have to backport anything at all - the only special version > you need is the debhelper 4.0.2.openoffice that contains a single bugfix for > a problem in Woody, and that is available from the debian-openoffice > mirrors. BTW, has it been proponed for woody-proposed-updates? signa

Re: building OOo1.1...

2003-07-14 Thread Chris Halls
Hi Jan, On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:23:02PM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote: > Yesterday I started my second try to build OOo from source. > Unfortunatelly it again failed with this error: > --8<-:- snip -:-8<-:- snip -:-8<-- > /usr/bin/ar rv uconvmsg/libuconvmsg.a uconvmsg/

building OOo1.1...

2003-07-13 Thread Jan Schulz
Hallo! Yesterday I started my second try to build OOo from source. Unfortunatelly it again failed with this error: --8<-:- snip -:-8<-:- snip -:-8<-- /usr/bin/ar rv uconvmsg/libuconvmsg.a uconvmsg/uconvmsg_dat.o a - uconvmsg/uconvmsg_dat.o Inconsistency detected by