Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

2006-03-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Dienstag 21 März 2006 13:36 schrieb Martin Michlmayr: > * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 12:32]: > > > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? > > > > No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right > > now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the cu

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:19]: > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? I've got hold of the patches now. I'll review what I'v been sent exactly and then move this discussion over to debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org > I guess they work only with non-Java, tho

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 13:19]: > > Apparently they also have patches for OOo. > > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the current patches. > I guess

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 12:32]: > > Oh? Are they sent upstream? Are they for 2.0.x? > > No, they said they were too busy to clean them up for submission right > now. I'll see if I can get a copy of the current patches. (Oh, and yes, they are for 2.0). -- Martin Michlm

Re: buildd disk space and debug symbols

2006-03-21 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am Dienstag 21 März 2006 12:56 schrieb Martin Michlmayr: > * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]: > > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is > > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on > > arches like m68k, mips, sparc, where the