I found a bug, but not in the Debian Package.
The tooltip texts on the toolbars doesn't work. But, again, this is not
related to the package.
The backport works fine upgrading from 3.4.x.
Anyways, ignoring the missing tooltip texts, the overall result is a
very good packages.
El jue, 16-08-2012
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:36:54PM -0500, Félix Arreola Rodríguez wrote:
> El mié, 15-08-2012 a las 10:53 +0200, Rene Engelhard escribió:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:03:54AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Please test the packages at
> > > http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/bpo...
> >
Really, really thanks!
El mié, 15-08-2012 a las 10:53 +0200, Rene Engelhard escribió:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:03:54AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Please test the packages at
> > http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/bpo...
>
> Forget it, for whatever nonsensical reason libreoffice-
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:18:53AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Quoting "Rene Engelhard" :
> >Please test the packages at
> >http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/bpo...
>
> Are other architectures (i.e. i386) in the works? Will test then ASAP.
Only when it's uploaded to squeeze-backpor
Quoting "Rene Engelhard" :
Please test the packages at
http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/bpo...
Are other architectures (i.e. i386) in the works? Will test then ASAP.
(Btw. thanks again for working on LO backports! In my company Squeeze
on the developers desktops would be almost impos
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:03:54AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Please test the packages at
> http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/bpo...
Forget it, for whatever nonsensical reason libreoffice-java-common
gained a depends on openoffice.org-java-common which is of course
b*it
Regards,
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:06:15PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > If you backport 3.5.x I will be eternally grateful. But right now I'm
>
> Just running a testbuild with...
[...]
Please test the packages at
http://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/bpo...
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:41:46AM -0500, Félix Arreola Rodríguez wrote:
> Well, Yes 3.4.x is a very good release, but I'm having some problems
Actually, 3.4.x ia a BAD release compared to 3.5.x...
> If you backport 3.5.x I will be eternally grateful. But right now I'm
Just running a testbuild w
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:41:46AM -0500, Félix Arreola Rodríguez wrote:
> building the package, becasue I think I could start the build and took
> me more than 1 hour for finish. By the way, how much time takes to build
> libreoffice?
A LOT more than 1 hour :)
> > - you need to add a patch
El lun, 13-08-2012 a las 18:00 +0200, Rene Engelhard escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:08:42AM -0500, Félix Arreola Rodríguez wrote:
> > Libreoffice 3.5. Is a sad new, because I really need the new version.
>
> Sorry, I don't buy that. You WANT, but that's not NEED. I know 3.4.x
> is
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:08:42AM -0500, Félix Arreola Rodríguez wrote:
> Libreoffice 3.5. Is a sad new, because I really need the new version.
Sorry, I don't buy that. You WANT, but that's not NEED. I know 3.4.x
isn't really a good LO release, but it works.
But that said, given that the ba
Hi!,
I hear somewhere that the LibreOffice team was not going to backport
Libreoffice 3.5. Is a sad new, because I really need the new version.
Anyways, I decided to backport libreoffice for my personal use. If the
package gains quality, I could upload it to backports.
But, I know that libreoffi
12 matches
Mail list logo
