On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:04:25PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > The attached patch might solve that "problem" and stop touching
> > ~/.mailcap for the user. I found that it also edits ~/.mime.types by
> > browsing that file, I hav
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 12:44]:
[903_remove_mailcap_mime.types_handling.diff]
> Cool, thanks a lot :) I'll try it next time I'm rebuilding completely.
>
> The mime stuff is already done, thanks to John Cooper - I made a packaging
> mistake with it. Just run update-mime as r
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:04:25PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> The attached patch might solve that "problem" and stop touching
> ~/.mailcap for the user. I found that it also edits ~/.mime.types by
> browsing that file, I have disabled that, too. Though I haven't found
> that special entries
* Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 11:37]:
> That should be all the magic needed. I now grepped through the source
> and found that in
> build-tree/oo_1.0_src/setup2/source/custom/regmimetypes/regmimetypes.cxx
> line 93 .mailcap defines FILE_NAME_MAILCAP. Need to investigate
> furt
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 11:26]:
> Sorry, typo on my part - I meant Mail-Followup-To :) and now my mutt gets
> the To/Cc right by itself, thanks.
Well, not needed anymore, I'm now subscribed *gg*
>> Uhm, don't think that that would be a good idea. Could lead to security
>>
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:35:38AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Reply-To is not the place I
> want to play with. At least for mutt users I did set the
> Mail-Followup-To: Header.
Sorry, typo on my part - I meant Mail-Followup-To :) and now my mutt gets
the To/Cc right by itself, thanks.
> Uhm
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 16:14]:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> Thanks for the Cc, don't forget it next time, too :)
>
> :) Have you heard of the Reply-To: header? That does just what you want.
Yes, but the Reply-To: Header is for some
Hi ..
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:53:57PM +0100, John M Cooper wrote:
>> [openoffice script checks for ~/.openoffice hardcoded instead of
>> checking ~/.sversionrc]
>> > Hmm, well at least with a fixed ~/.openoffice we know if the user ran
>> setup
>> > manually for themselves :)
>> >
>> > The w
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:13:30PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Thanks for the Cc, don't forget it next time, too :)
:) Have you heard of the Reply-To: header? That does just what you want.
> * Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 14:47]:
> Am not sure, didn't check the source about i
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 14:13, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
> [openoffice script checks for ~/.openoffice hardcoded instead of
> checking ~/.sversionrc]
> > Hmm, well at least with a fixed ~/.openoffice we know if the user ran
> setup
> > manually for themselves :)
> >
> > The whole setup thing needs
Hi again!
Thanks for the Cc, don't forget it next time, too :)
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 14:47]:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> openoffice registers itself in ~/.mailcap -- at the *start*. Would be
>> nice to have it at the end
Hi Gerfried,
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:42:58PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> openoffice registers itself in ~/.mailcap -- at the *start*. Would be
> nice to have it at the end instead.
Um, I think that's an upstream issue, isn't it?
> About the idea having openoffice registered globally thr
Hi!
Jan encouraged me to mail you directly :) I stumbled upon some things
that I noticed that I'd like to share with you. First of all, I'm not
subscribed to the list so please Cc me on replies that aren't about only
internal hick-hack ,)
openoffice registers itself in ~/.mailcap -- a
13 matches
Mail list logo
