# documentation
severity 671910 minor
quit
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I honestly do not care at all what 1.0.1 did. That was pre-woody...
>
> It could be that the infamous "user install" needed (gone away with 2.x)
> by then did that, but it's so much museum, that it's completely
> non-relevant by n
Hi,
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:40:52PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:26:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> >>> sh: 1: /home/steve/.openoffice/1.0.1/soffice: not found
> >>> Press any key to continue...
> >>
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:40:52PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:26:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> >>> sh: 1: /home/steve/.openoffice/1.0.1/soffice: not found
> >>> Press any key to continue...
> >>
> >>
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:26:09PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>>> sh: 1: /home/steve/.openoffice/1.0.1/soffice: not found
>>> Press any key to continue...
>>
>> Does your ~/.mailcap refer to that program?
>
> Yes, actually. Not sure how it g
4 matches
Mail list logo