Hi,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 12:06:21AM +0100, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> Hi ..
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:36:05AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> I in doubt, that some people at Sun unstand the hole buildsystem for
> >> OpenOffice.
> >he, he. I think there are some people at Sun who unde
Re Hi :)
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:38:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hope I'll explain managers at work, how build
>> system is important for developer, that it is more important then these silly
>> internationalization fixes and features, that it will give more attention to
>> our compa
Hi ..
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 08:36:05AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I in doubt, that some people at Sun unstand the hole buildsystem for
>> OpenOffice.
>he, he. I think there are some people at Sun who understand what there are
>doing ;). Where do you see the one large build script in the
Hi,
>
> I must admit, I fully agree with Bernhard. OpenOffice ibuild system is ugly,
> ugly, ugly, and once more ugly.
This argument doesn't convince me. arguments don't get better by repeating.
> Hope I'll explain managers at work, how build
> system is important for developer, that it is more
++ 05/03/02 08:36 +0100 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:53:51PM +0100, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> > Hi ...
> >
> > >> build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want.
> > >The Problem is, that there is currently only the one large build-script
> > >from the OpenOffice.
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:53:51PM +0100, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> Hi ...
>
> >> build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want.
> >The Problem is, that there is currently only the one large build-script
> >from the OpenOffice.org guys. This is like the code an very large
> >moloch,
Hi ..
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 06:51:51PM -0600, Rene Horn wrote:
>So, from what I can tell, the problems with bison have been resolved? Also,
>it seems pretty evident that I shouldn't trust the build scripts?
Yes there is a patch for in the issuezilla or at
www.linux-debian.de/openoffice. I
Hi ...
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 01:03:15PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>* Rene Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020302 20:28]:
>> I know, but you don't actually have a listing showing what builds (and how
>> to
>> build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want.
>The Problem is, that there
* Rene Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020302 20:28]:
> I know, but you don't actually have a listing showing what builds (and how to
> build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want.
The Problem is, that there is currently only the one large build-script
from the OpenOffice.org guys. This i
Hi ...
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 10:23:44AM -0600, Rene Horn wrote:
>> http://www.linux-debian.org/openoffice
>I know, but you don't actually have a listing showing what builds (and how to
>build those things) and what doesn't. That's what I want.
It doesn't build yet ... my errors, I get, are a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 02 March 2002 07:35 am, you wrote:
>
> Have a look at:
>
> http://www.linux-debian.org/openoffice
>
> Regards
>
> Jan
I know, but you don't actually have a listing showing what builds (and how to
build those things) and
Hi ..
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 05:10:09PM -0600, Rene Horn wrote:
>This may be a dumb request, but could you guys put up on the web page what
>currently builds and what does not and how to build that which builds? That
>would be extremely helpful so that I could concentrate on the problems rath
12 matches
Mail list logo
