On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 10:05:51AM +0200, Arnaud Ligot wrote:
> why don't you put this debian package in the woody ? It seems to be
> stable...
Firstly, we are much too late for Woody - we would have had to upload a
stable package by mid-April to the archive.
Second, Debian developers are expecte
Le ven 14/06/2002 à 13:35, Jan-Hendrik Palic a écrit :
> Hi ..
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:20:10PM +0200, POLCHER Jan wrote:
>
> >The apt-get install fails with the following message :
> >openoffice.org: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:3.1) but 1:3.0.4-7 is to be installed
why don't you put this debia
Hi ...
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:26:41PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
>I think this is a FAQ. Could we put this somewhere on the web page ?
>And speaking about them, why not moving them to the main web site ?
>Or we need at least a link from the devel page, in the the "project" section.
Yes ..
I think this is a FAQ. Could we put this somewhere on the web page ?
And speaking about them, why not moving them to the main web site ?
Or we need at least a link from the devel page, in the the "project" section.
Bye, Mt.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:25:58PM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
> On Friday 1
On Friday 14 Jun 2002 12:20, POLCHER Jan wrote:
> I have just tried to install OpenOffice.
>
> The apt-get install fails with the following message :
> openoffice.org: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:3.1) but 1:3.0.4-7 is to be
> installed
>
> Does this mean that one needs to go to the unstable distributio
Hi ..
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 01:20:10PM +0200, POLCHER Jan wrote:
>The apt-get install fails with the following message :
>openoffice.org: Depends: libgcc1 (>= 1:3.1) but 1:3.0.4-7 is to be installed
Only install libgcc1 from sid .. thats enough!
regards
Jan
--
.''
6 matches
Mail list logo
