Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:15:03AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > arm32 (and ABI-specific, calling conventions, etc.) code to also > > > work with amd64. > > [...] > > > See apt-get source libreoffice, > > > bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm. > > > > Given arm64 probably won't be in je

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-28 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:05:55 +0200 Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > And I would actually be surprised it would work without porting the > > arm32 (and ABI-specific, calling conventions, etc.) code to also > > work with amd64. > [...] > >

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:07:57AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > And I would actually be surprised it would work without porting the arm32 > (and ABI-specific, calling conventions, etc.) code to also work with amd64. [...] > See apt-get source libreoffice, bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_arm. G

Re: Installability of desktops on arm64

2014-07-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 07:59:11PM +0100, peter green wrote: > gnome: in addition to other problems mentioned above blocked by > missing libreoffice. Debian libreoffice package doesn't even try to > build on arm64 (not in architecture list afaict). Ubuntu has > libreoffice on arm64 but their v