Hi Chris, hi *,
Chris Halls wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:31:38PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Andy Saxena wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > > I suggest for all of you often using OpenOffice.org to take a look at
> > > > package ooqstart-
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:31:38PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Andy Saxena wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > I suggest for all of you often using OpenOffice.org to take a look at
> > > package ooqstart-gnome in unstable.
> > > OOo now
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:31:38PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Andy Saxena wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > > I suggest for all of you often using OpenOffice.org to take a look at
> > > package ooqstart-gnome in unstable.
> > > OOo now
Hi Andy,
Andy Saxena wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> > I suggest for all of you often using OpenOffice.org to take a look at
> > package ooqstart-gnome in unstable.
> > OOo now launches in seconds instead of minutes on low-end machines (PII
> > 350MHz +
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:46:07PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote:
> I suggest for all of you often using OpenOffice.org to take a look at
> package ooqstart-gnome in unstable.
> OOo now launches in seconds instead of minutes on low-end machines (PII
> 350MHz + 128 MB RAM).
What happend to the KDE
I suggest for all of you often using OpenOffice.org to take a look at
package ooqstart-gnome in unstable.
OOo now launches in seconds instead of minutes on low-end machines (PII
350MHz + 128 MB RAM).
6 matches
Mail list logo