Re: PATCH: get-orig-source without split

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 09:01:50PM +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: > RE> But yes, please push it. (Note the branch changed to > RE> 3.1.1/unstable...) > > Should I cherrypick it for 3.2, btw? Not necessary. 3.2 isn't in a usable state anyway, and at some time I'll do a complete bzr merge > Let's wa

Re: PATCH: get-orig-source without split

> "RE" == Rene Engelhard writes: RE> Hi, RE> On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 08:09:35PM +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: >> If the attached patch which implements get-orig-source without splitting >> is suitable, I'd push it. RE> I'd like it more if it wasn't duplicating the various cleanups becau

Re: PATCH: get-orig-source without split

Hi, On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 08:09:35PM +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: > If the attached patch which implements get-orig-source without splitting > is suitable, I'd push it. I'd like it more if it wasn't duplicating the various cleanups becaue that might lead one placed patched and other not. At which t

PATCH: get-orig-source without split

Rene, all. If the attached patch which implements get-orig-source without splitting is suitable, I'd push it. -- Best regards, Rail Aliev === modified file 'rules' --- rules 2009-08-26 06:18:26 + +++ rules 2009-08-29 16:04:34 + @@ -3397,8 +3397,52 @@ endif cd ooo-build && NOCONFIGURE