Re: New diff.gz and .dsc

2002-03-17 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hi, Jan! ++ 15/03/02 19:23 +0100 - Jan-Hendrik Palic: > Chris mentioned, that setup.bin will fail, perhaps, someone has a hint > and my tell us, why : AFAIR, the problem is in binutils. Can you try to upgrade them from sid? I hope you all build openoffice with gcc3.0, right? Bye, Nidd.

zipdep and oo-xvfb-run (Was: Re: New diff.gz and .dsc)

2002-03-16 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Samuli Suonpaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I couldn't figure out why. The command I used to start the build > process was 'fakeroot debian/rules build'. Now trying with 'debuild > -rfakeroot'. Will report that run in the morning. Ok, done. Let's see... From stderr-log: fakeroot debian/rules cl

Re: New diff.gz and .dsc

2002-03-15 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I applied the three patches from Chris related to xvfb-run. > I hope, the build on intel will just finish ... > please try it out and mail some errormessages to this list (no > bugreports to BTS :P). First thing, right at the start: chmod: getting

Re: New diff.gz and .dsc

2002-03-15 Thread Samuli Suonpaa
Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I applied the three patches from Chris related to xvfb-run. How about giving new files new names every now and then? Feels quite odd having downloaded openoffice_0.641c-1.diff.gz for God knows how many times and every time ended up with different res

New diff.gz and .dsc

2002-03-15 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic
Hi .. I applied the three patches from Chris related to xvfb-run. I hope, the build on intel will just finish ... please try it out and mail some errormessages to this list (no bugreports to BTS :P). On PPC there are some problems, I hope to fix them newxt week. Chris mentioned, that setup.bin