Hi ..
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 12:54:39PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>Regarding the CVS repository. Why not put only the debian directory
>under source control, as done with gcc?
>See http://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=debian-gcc
I thought about it .. I think it is a possibility :)
I asked at debi
Regarding the CVS repository. Why not put only the debian directory
under source control, as done with gcc?
See http://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=debian-gcc
* Ken Foskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011007 14:48]:
> Mistake 1:Do not use head.
>
Some other things that can cause harm without anything in the
build-system giving information are:
TrueType-fonts installed
/proc not mounted
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
The man who trade
Multiple replies
To convert Open Office to auto anything is impossible, IMHO. No doubt
there will be a development thread that tries and they might suceed.
Frankly this is not my interest. The process works well so long as
you do not drift from the script to get the thing compiling. I
* Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011006 18:21]:
> Hi Bernhard
>
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 05:45:49PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> >* Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011006 17:31]:
> >> ok ... any hints to get off the javac dependencies and go over to
> >> gcj/kaffe, if Java is r
Hi Bernhard
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 05:45:49PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>* Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011006 17:31]:
>> ok ... any hints to get off the javac dependencies and go over to
>> gcj/kaffe, if Java is really required.
>>
>> Is it possible to kick Java in OpenOffice at
Hi Joey ..
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 05:54:08PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>> >Have you considered running a semi-public development CVS Repository
>> >for the OpenOffice source already? You could request /cvs/openoffice
>> >on cvs.debian.org and move the current source
Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
> >Have you considered running a semi-public development CVS Repository
> >for the OpenOffice source already? You could request /cvs/openoffice
> >on cvs.debian.org and move the current source into it.
>
> Hmmm the idea is good, but two cvs are senseless, I think! But on
Ken Foskey wrote:
> >Have you considered running a semi-public development CVS Repository
> >for the OpenOffice source already? You could request /cvs/openoffice
> >on cvs.debian.org and move the current source into it.
> >
> Why have two source repositories. This seems a little risky. If you
Hi Ken!
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 12:32:40AM +1000, Ken Foskey wrote:
>>Have you considered running a semi-public development CVS Repository
>>for the OpenOffice source already? You could request /cvs/openoffice
>>on cvs.debian.org and move the current source into it.
>Why have two source repositor
Hi joey ...
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 03:45:34PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>What are the plans for future development for OpenOffice packages for
>Debian?
I'm in doubt to take the whole source in debian ... just an overkill,
but split the source into many packages will take much t
Martin Schulze wrote:
Have you considered running a semi-public development CVS Repository
for the OpenOffice source already? You could request /cvs/openoffice
on cvs.debian.org and move the current source into it.
Why have two source repositories. This seems a little risky. If you
can pa
What are the plans for future development for OpenOffice packages for
Debian?
Have you considered running a semi-public development CVS Repository
for the OpenOffice source already? You could request /cvs/openoffice
on cvs.debian.org and move the current source into it.
This way, more people
13 matches
Mail list logo
