Re: FSF to fork OOo over java

2005-05-11 Thread Bruce Byfield
Josh Triplett wrote: > That page does *not* mean that the FSF will be forking OO.o. That page > simply states that developers from both OO.o and the GCJ project are > actively working to ensure that OO.o 2.0 will run with GCJ 4.0. What > part of that article makes you believe that the FSF has an

Re: FSF to fork OOo over java

2005-05-11 Thread Josh Triplett
Bruce Byfield wrote: > http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html > > I'm planning to follow up on this news in an article for Newsforge. Does > anybody have any comments they would like to make? > > I'll be checking this list tomorrow, but if people could cc me, I'd > appreciate it -- I have

Re: FSF to fork OOo over java

2005-05-09 Thread Clive Menzies
On (08/05/05 18:26), Bruce Byfield wrote: > See: > > http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html > > I'm planning to follow up on this news in an article for Newsforge. Does > anybody have any comments they would like to make? > > I'll be checking this list tomorrow, but if people could cc me,

FSF to fork OOo over java

2005-05-08 Thread Bruce Byfield
See: http://www.fsf.org/news/open-office-java.html I'm planning to follow up on this news in an article for Newsforge. Does anybody have any comments they would like to make? I'll be checking this list tomorrow, but if people could cc me, I'd appreciate it -- I have a lot of ground to cover on t