Hi ..
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:44:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Theese goals make an smooth and nice build mostly impossible. If
>> the Right Way[tm] won't work on some hpux OS and windows, it has to
>> work around. As it has to cope with systems were resonable things fail,
>> it ten
++ 06/03/02 11:34 +0100 - Bernhard R. Link:
> Their system does quite an good job to comapile an huge pice of code,
> build around the compiler errors of dozens of architectures trying
> not to interfer with strange environments to get an office suite
> in one piece and doing on their own.
I have
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:34:19AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
> Before we start a flamewar here about building scripts, I want to
> say that I'm not of the opinion that the upstream OO.o scripts
> are totally flawed.
>
> In comparision with the state of the other OO.o code is it quite good
Before we start a flamewar here about building scripts, I want to
say that I'm not of the opinion that the upstream OO.o scripts
are totally flawed.
In comparision with the state of the other OO.o code is it quite good
and useable, it just has goals total away from what building packages
for Deb
4 matches
Mail list logo
