On Wednesday 31 March 2004 14:06, Chris Halls wrote:
> Did you need to make any more changes to the packages?
Well, I have built and I am using, amongst others, backports of X 4.3.0,
fontconfig and libfreetype. So I can't really make a statement regarding a
pure woody system, but besides the rem
system-myspell" flags
> to make it work. Maybe these should only be used when not building on woody,
> also since libmyspell3 doesn't even exist on woody.
That sounds reasonable to me, since when backporting it helps to try and
reduce the number of extra dependencies (like I
-2.95. It works if I use gcc-3.0 to build
the backports, but this seems undesirable to me on an otherwise pure
2.95-system.
I eventually removed the "--with-system-db" and "--with-system-myspell" flags
to make it work. Maybe these should only be used when not building on woo
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:38:35PM +0200, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> Any reason why it's not in the apt source along with the other packages?
Um, good point. I put that package up long before the Woody source.
Chris
pgpNIoXAb9RPb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Torsdag 26. september 2002 10:56 skreiv Chris Halls:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:26:49AM +0200, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> > Can you also tell me where to find debhelper version 4.0.2.openoffice? It
> > sounds like it might be a backport to Woody, and I'd rather avoid
> > upgrading packages to
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:26:49AM +0200, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> Can you also tell me where to find debhelper version 4.0.2.openoffice? It
> sounds like it might be a backport to Woody, and I'd rather avoid upgrading
> packages to unstable.
You can find it here:
http://ftp.freenet.de/pu
Onsdag 25. september 2002 16:08 skreiv Chris Halls:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> > libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev is installed, so that's not the problem. (It just
> > appeared a couple of lines further down in the installation log, so I
> > missed it last tim
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:22:58PM +0200, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev is installed, so that's not the problem. (It just
> appeared a couple of lines further down in the installation log, so I missed
> it last time ;-)
Heh, someone finally noticed I cheated ;)
The patc
Onsdag 25. september 2002 15:16 skreiv Paul Cupis:
>
> I think you will need the corresponding -dev packages (eg
> libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev)
libstlport4.5gcc3.0-dev is installed, so that's not the problem. (It just
appeared a couple of lines further down in the installation log, so I missed
it la
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 13:44, Gaute Hvoslef Kvalnes wrote:
> In particular, libstlport4.5gcc3.0 and libstlport4.5-common (both
> 4.5.3-3+woody) were installed, so configure should have found it, right?
>
> When building with dpkg-buildpackage,
I have set up a chroot environment where I want to build OpenOffice.org for
Woody. When building, the configuration process says "configure: error:
STLport4 libraries not found" and stops.
In addition to the base system, I have installed build-essential. Then I did
"apt-get build-dep openoffice
Hi Jan,
yes, I used libstlport 4.0, but not before looking at your patch (and the patch
in the original oo tar.gz for libstlport4.5).
SORRY: Above line should read that I used libstlport 4.5, but my user agent
does not support this...
Anyway: I'm not too sure, but I figured that one should be ab
Hi Claudio,
Claudio Bandaloukas wrote:
I'm curious about another problem I have.
could you give me your kernel, glibc and gcc versions?
ii libc6 2.2.5-3
ii gcc2.95.4-9
ii kernel-image-2.4.17-tv 2
The kernel image is a custom configured but ot
Il Wednesday 13 March 2002, alle 20:11, Thomas Viehmann ha scritto:
> Hi.
>
> I tried building the oo source from linux-debian.de on "plain" _woody_
> (I know that the source is not intended to do so, but I'm thought it
> might be worth trying - who knows whether bison 1.33 makes it into woody
> a
Hi Thomas ...
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:11:59PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>I tried building the oo source from linux-debian.de on "plain" _woody_
>(I know that the source is not intended to do so, but I'm thought it
>might be worth trying - who knows whether bison 1.33 makes it into woody
>a
Hi.
I tried building the oo source from linux-debian.de on "plain" _woody_
(I know that the source is not intended to do so, but I'm thought it
might be worth trying - who knows whether bison 1.33 makes it into woody
and STLPort 4.5 probably needs to be tackled at some point of time, anyway.)
Bel
16 matches
Mail list logo
