Building OOo 1.1.5 packages for Sarge

Hi guys, As OOo 2.0 seems to be particularly difficult to build packages of for Sarge, what would be needed to build OOo 1.1.5 packages instead (it does support reading .odt at least) and where to start? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: building ooo

Hi Matt, sorry I've only just caught up with this mailing list On Thursday 16 Dec 2004 22:10, Matt Price wrote: > since it would be nice to have java and python supported in my > openoffice, thought I might try building OOo over the holidays. was > wondering whether it's

building ooo

hi folks, since it would be nice to have java and python supported in my openoffice, thought I might try building OOo over the holidays. was wondering whether it's really as simple as: apt-get source openoffice.org apt-get build-deb openoffice.org changing a couple of lines in debian/

Re: Sid chroot for building OOo

Hi, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > Do you think it is possible to make a Sid chroot under Woody to build > OOo? sure. install build-essential + the b-d in it; mount /proc into the chroot and you are fine... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://ww

Sid chroot for building OOo

Do you think it is possible to make a Sid chroot under Woody to build OOo? -- Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Misterioes Error with building OOo in tcsh

Hi .. !Just for your information! We got a log with the following error: + cp unix/linux/gnu/template.mk startup/config.mk make[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/OpenOffice/OO_Debian/openoffice.org-1.0.1/build-tree/oo_1.0.1_src/dmake' Word too long. make: *** [debian/stampdir/bootstrap] Error 1 s

Re: Problem building OOo

Hi On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:41:01PM +0100, Jerome Warnier wrote: >I build a Woody version of 1.0.1-5.6rc1. >It still remains one problem, besides the ones I already notified: it >only build help in English. Thats right .. you have one openoffice.org-help package, which contains the help-file

Problem building OOo

I build a Woody version of 1.0.1-5.6rc1. It still remains one problem, besides the ones I already notified: it only build help in English. Anyone any idea?

Re: [tools-dev] RTTI problem: building OOo with gcc3.2

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:07:33AM -0400, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote: > If it helps ppc linux did all its OOo builds with rtti enabled under gcc > 2.95.4 for a long time (right up to and including OOo 1.0 I belive). The > only issue we ran into really was linking to the Mozilla address book code

Re: [tools-dev] RTTI problem: building OOo with gcc3.2

Hi, > Is there a reason not to enable RTTI for the complete > build? If it helps ppc linux did all its OOo builds with rtti enabled under gcc 2.95.4 for a long time (right up to and including OOo 1.0 I belive). The only issue we ran into really was linking to the Mozilla address book code sin

RTTI problem: building OOo with gcc3.2

Debian is gearing up to moving to gcc3.2 as its compiler on all architectures, and Jan & I have attempted to build OOo using gcc 3.2. I have submitted issue #6927 to add support in lbnames.h. The next problem is a little more complicated. It appears that a gcc bugfix causes the build to break, d

Re: Building OOo

Peter Novodvorsky wrote: - little patch: http://people.altlinux.ru/nidd/openoffice-mozsrc.patch This is no longer required. They forgot to tag a new version properly, it is now corrected and verified by me. By the way thanks for the effort, can you post a URL for this on the web

Building OOo

Hello, I've written something that I name Building OpenOffice For Debian mini-HOWTO - (C) Peter 'Nidd' Novodvorsky Probably it will work on any other modern distribution, but I tried only Debian. System requires: Good processor, 128 Mb (256MB better),