Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2013-01-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56124 > which is fixed on master[1] (thus will be in LO 4.1 - yes, 4.1, not 4.0) > now. > 4.0 *might* get it too, though, see > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2013-

Processed: Re: Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2013-01-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 662798 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56124 Bug #662798 [libreoffice-calc] libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56124' from 'https://b

Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2013-01-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
forwarded 662798 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56124 tag 662798 + fixed-upstream tag 662798 + pending thanks Hi, On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:09:46PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > found 662798 1:3.5.0-1 > forwarded 662798 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34729 > tag 6627

Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2012-03-06 Thread Francesco Potortì
>found 662798 1:3.5.0-1 >forwarded 662798 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34729 >tag 662798 + upstream >thanks I see that you write "forwarded" above. Does this mean that my report will soon appear as a comment on bugzilla? Or else should I add a comment myself to the above bug?

Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2012-03-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:36:40PM +0100, Francesco Potortì wrote: > I see that you write "forwarded" above. Does this mean that my report > will soon appear as a comment on bugzilla? Or else should I add a No? Why should it? There's a bug in bugzilla. End of needed actions. > comment myse

Processed: Re: Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2012-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 662798 1:3.5.0-1 Bug #662798 [libreoffice-calc] libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented Bug Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:3.5.0-1. > forwarded 662798 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34729 Bug #662798 [libreoffice-c

Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2012-03-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
found 662798 1:3.5.0-1 forwarded 662798 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34729 tag 662798 + upstream thanks Hi, On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:49:04PM +0100, Francesco Potortì wrote: > Package: libreoffice-calc > Version: 1:3.4.5-2 I think if you open a feature request you should not fil

Bug#662798: libreoffice-calc: IFERROR not implemented

2012-03-06 Thread Francesco Potortì
Package: libreoffice-calc Version: 1:3.4.5-2 Severity: wishlist The IFERROR function, wich is implemented in current Excel and Gnumeric spreadsheets, is very convenient for simplifying some long formulas. In fact, IF(ISERROR(long_formula_here),"",long_formula_here) becomes simply