On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:47:55PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> yeah, sorry about that: the submits were done with mass-bug, but the
> tool is affected by a bug (#605235) that generated 3 identical reports
> instead of 3 for different versions (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8 1:3.2.1-7,
> 1:3.3.0~beta2-2)
Ah
Hi Rene,
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 00:29, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> found 605178 1:3.2.1-7
> found 605178 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8
> severity 605178 minor
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:45:58PM +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
>
> If the log says 2.4.1 and 3.2.1, too, why d
found 605178 1:3.2.1-7
found 605178 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8
severity 605178 minor
thanks
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:45:58PM +, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
If the log says 2.4.1 and 3.2.1, too, why did you file it only against
1:3.3.0~beta2-2? :)
> Severity: important
Well, i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 605178 1:3.2.1-7
Bug #605178 [python-uno] python-uno: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure
way
Bug #605181 [python-uno] python-uno: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure
way
Bug #605193 [python-uno] python-uno: Use of PYTHONPATH env
Package: python-uno
Version: 1:3.3.0~beta2-2
Severity: important
Tags: security
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pythonpath
Jakub Wilk performed an analysis[1] for packages setting PYTHONPATH in
an insecure way. Those packages do something like:
PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH
5 matches
Mail list logo