Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed

2004-11-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
reassign openoffice.org rettitle 281645 do something that -l10n-* could be included in tasksel severity 281645 wishlist thanks Hi, Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2004 06:40 schrieb Christian Perrier: > Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > From debian-boot discussion, OOo l10n-* packages won'

Processed: Re: Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed

2004-11-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign openoffice.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > rettitle 281645 do something that -l10n-* could be included in tasksel Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 281645 wishlist Bug#281645: are l10n pack

Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed

2004-11-18 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > reassign 281645 openoffice.org-bin > retitle 281645 are l10n packages not ready for sarge? > thanks > > From debian-boot discussion, OOo l10n-* packages won't be installed by > tasksel. OOo team, could you care about this? Some will probably say that I'

Processed: Re: Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed

2004-11-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 281645 openoffice.org-bin Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `openoffice.org-bin'. > retitle 281645 are l10n packages not ready for sarge? Bug#2816