Re: Bug#258967: CUPS instances and properties in OOo

2004-07-19 Thread Chris Halls
Hi Joost, On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 23:35, Joost Andrae wrote: > I expect the fix for the CUPS instances problem being fixed within the > next src680m48 master build or src680m49. I already verified the two > CUPS related issues yesterday and nominated the child workspace vcl24 > for integration in

Re: Bug#258967: CUPS instances and properties in OOo

2004-07-16 Thread Joost Andrae
Hi Chris, I expect the fix for the CUPS instances problem being fixed within the next src680m48 master build or src680m49. I already verified the two CUPS related issues yesterday and nominated the child workspace vcl24 for integration into the OOo master. Kind regards, Joost

Bug#258967: CUPS instances and properties in OOo

2004-07-13 Thread Lenar Lõhmus
Chris Halls wrote: Lenar, this works ok in my 1.1.2-2. Do you have any further information that will help me reproduce your setup? Are you absolutely sure that all OOo processes were restarted after the upgrade? I'm sure no Oo.o was running. Since then I've restarted the machine and right

Processed: Re: Bug#258967: CUPS instances and properties in OOo

2004-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 258967 + unreproduceable Unknown tag/s: unreproduceable. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixe

Bug#258967: CUPS instances and properties in OOo

2004-07-13 Thread Chris Halls
On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 11:38, Lenar Lõhmus wrote: > Maybe it has something to do with backporting errors (like in multiple > instances case). The original problem was not a backporting error - it was a problem in the code I backported from. Philip is the upstream author of the code which is why