On Mon 2025-04-14 16:26:07 +0200, René Engelhard wrote:
> [ dkg wrote: ]
>> To the extent that LibreOffice's OpenPGP integration is all done in Java
>
> Nope. gpgmepp.
Ah, condolences, that is a complex and fiddly mechanism if the only
things needed are signing (with known keys)and verification (w
On Mon 2025-04-14 13:53:16 +0200, René Engelhard wrote:
> It's still only test keys to test whether signing/verify works, not real
> world keys.
>
> But yeah, they need to be updated, will propose upstream. It's
> definitely too late for Trixie though, will try to get it upstream
> for forky.
Hi,
Am 14.04.25 um 13:00 schrieb Holger Levsen:
control: reassign -1 src:libreoffice
control: severity -1 normal
control: affects -1 gpg-from-sq
thanks
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
Looking purely at the key material I see:
[...]
It is not incompatible, just
Hi,
Am 14.04.25 um 16:06 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
On Mon 2025-04-14 13:53:16 +0200, René Engelhard wrote:
It's still only test keys to test whether signing/verify works, not real world
keys.
But yeah, they need to be updated, will propose upstream. It's
definitely too late for Trixie
Hi,
Am 14. April 2025 16:06:45 MESZ schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor :
>On Mon 2025-04-14 13:53:16 +0200, René Engelhard wrote:
>> It's still only test keys to test whether signing/verify works, not real
>> world keys.
>>
>> But yeah, they need to be updated, will propose upstream. It's
>> defini
Hi,
Am 14. April 2025 13:43:20 MESZ schrieb Justus Winter :
>René Engelhard writes:
>
>> If you divert /usr/bin/gpg, IMHO you need to behave like gpg.
>
>gpg doesn't behave like gpg. Just look at all the version-specific
>hacks in GPGME if you don't take my word for it. (...)
I believe you.
6 matches
Mail list logo
