Bug#1103056: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-15 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2025-04-14 16:26:07 +0200, René Engelhard wrote: > [ dkg wrote: ] >> To the extent that LibreOffice's OpenPGP integration is all done in Java > > Nope. gpgmepp. Ah, condolences, that is a complex and fiddly mechanism if the only things needed are signing (with known keys)and verification (w

Bug#1103056: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2025-04-14 13:53:16 +0200, René Engelhard wrote: > It's still only test keys to test whether signing/verify works, not real > world keys. > > But yeah, they need to be updated, will propose upstream. It's > definitely too late for Trixie though, will try to get it upstream > for forky.

Bug#1103056: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 14.04.25 um 13:00 schrieb Holger Levsen: control: reassign -1 src:libreoffice control: severity -1 normal control: affects -1 gpg-from-sq thanks On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: Looking purely at the key material I see: [...] It is not incompatible, just

Bug#1103056: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 14.04.25 um 16:06 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor: On Mon 2025-04-14 13:53:16 +0200, René Engelhard wrote: It's still only test keys to test whether signing/verify works, not real world keys. But yeah, they need to be updated, will propose upstream. It's definitely too late for Trixie

Bug#1103056: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread René Engelhard
Hi, Am 14. April 2025 16:06:45 MESZ schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor : >On Mon 2025-04-14 13:53:16 +0200, René Engelhard wrote: >> It's still only test keys to test whether signing/verify works, not real >> world keys. >> >> But yeah, they need to be updated, will propose upstream. It's >> defini

Bug#1103056: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread René Engelhard
Hi, Am 14. April 2025 13:43:20 MESZ schrieb Justus Winter : >René Engelhard writes: > >> If you divert /usr/bin/gpg, IMHO you need to behave like gpg. > >gpg doesn't behave like gpg. Just look at all the version-specific >hacks in GPGME if you don't take my word for it. (...) I believe you.

Processed: Processed (with 3 errors): Re: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 1103016 -1 Bug #1103016 [src:libreoffice] incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS Bug 1103016 cloned as bug 1103056 > retitle -1 test gpg keys use weak hash algorithm, breaking with gpg-from-sq Bug #1103056 [src:libreoffice] incompatibility w

Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread René Engelhard
clone -1 -2 retitle -2 test gpg keys use weak hash algorithm, breaking with gpg-from-sq reassign -1 gpg-from-sq thanks Hi, Am 14. April 2025 13:00:23 MESZ schrieb Holger Levsen : >On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:05:20AM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: >> Looking purely at the key material I see: >[...

Processed: Re: Bug#1103016: incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS

2025-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:libreoffice Bug #1103016 [gpg-from-sq] incompatibility with gpg causing FTBFS Bug reassigned from package 'gpg-from-sq' to 'src:libreoffice'. No longer marked as found in versions rust-sequoia-chameleon-gnupg/0.13.1-3. Ignoring request to alter fixed