subject:"\[porting\-dev\] Summary\: 64\-bit porting efforts"

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

2003-01-29 Thread Ron Johnson

On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:45, Sander Vesik wrote: > --- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gwenole, > > > > [CCing to debian-openoffice] > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > > This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit > > >

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

2003-01-29 Thread Sander Vesik

--- Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gwenole, > > [CCing to debian-openoffice] > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit > > architectures. > [...] > > * Linux/Alpha: Debian people showed

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

2003-01-29 Thread Jan-Hendrik Palic

Hi .. On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 06:35:02PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: >[CCing to debian-openoffice] >On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: >> This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit >> architectures. >[...] >> * Linux/Alpha: Debian people showed i

Re: [porting-dev] Summary: 64-bit porting efforts

2003-01-29 Thread Chris Halls

Hi Gwenole, [CCing to debian-openoffice] On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > This is a summary of porting efforts, I am aware of, to 64-bit > architectures. [...] > * Linux/Alpha: Debian people showed interest > , but no pa