Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/16 00:36, Lionel Elie Mamane said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:48:05PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2012/03/15 23:26, Lionel Elie Mamane said: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:18:38AM +0800, imacat wrote: > If you were to go forward with this, "right of use&q

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
Sorry, I almost forgot. To be noted, On 2012/03/16 00:29, Rene Engelhard said: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:25:07AM +0800, imacat wrote: > >> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice's people

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
lie Mamane said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:48:05PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2012/03/15 23:26, Lionel Elie Mamane said: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:18:38AM +0800, imacat wrote: >>>> If you must know, I already made Apache OpenOffice different from >>

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 21:28, imacat said: > On 2012/03/15 21:02, Rene Engelhard said: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote: >>> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to >>> submit their real name in order to be taken seriously.

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
To the Debian list masters, Alexander Wirt and everyone: Sorry, I forgot to cite the list maintainer's words for prove. On 2012/03/16 00:04, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:59:15PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice > I do

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 23:25, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:00:54PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> That is very confusing. I remember the Debian list masters said >> this list is for OpenOffice and LibreOffice together just *hours ago*. >> Or maybe I am insane? >

Re: debian-openoffice vs. debian-libreoffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 22:44, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39:01PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2012/03/15 22:04, Rene Engelhard said: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:50:28PM +0800, imacat wrote: >>>>> I haven't disputed your right to post here :-) &g

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 22:36, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:34:21PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> * You were making fun of my name. > Yes, and if you feel better I apologize but still, you should use > your real name to we can take anything you "submit" as package ser

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 21:22, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:17:09PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote: >>> But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the apa

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 21:02, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote: >> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to >> submit their real name in order to be taken seriously. What changed you? > Wrong. Maintainer fields have

Re: debian-openoffice vs. debian-libreoffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 21:00, Alexander Wirt said: > Rene Engelhard schrieb am Thursday, den 15. March 2012: >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote: >>>>> Nice to meet you. I did not expect to talk to you here directly. >>>> Well, this is the

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote: > But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the apache side > which consists also of simple lies... You are accusing something very seriously. As the originator of this d

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 01.03.15 03:01pm, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:34:27AM +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2012/03/15 11:18, imacat said: >>>> P.S: And I believe that people will take you more serious if you didn'z >>>> post with funny "imarcat" in Fr

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-15 Thread imacat
On 01.03.15 02:58pm, Rene Engelhard said: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:18:38AM +0800, imacat wrote: >> On 2012/03/15 07:53, Rene Engelhard said: >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:39:09AM +0800, imacat wrote: >> If you must know, I already made Apache OpenOffice different f

Re: Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-14 Thread imacat
On 2012/03/15 11:18, imacat said: >> P.S: And I believe that people will take you more serious if you didn'z >> post with funny "imarcat" in From but a real name. > P.S. Oh, sorry. If you must know, my real name is Yang Shih-Ching. I > used the name "im

Packaging Apache OpenOffice

2012-03-14 Thread imacat
Dear all, Hi. I would like to ask what should I do if I would like to package and submit the Apache OpenOffice package? Apache OpenOffice is following the Apache license, and version 3.4 is going to be released. It would be nice if we can make it into wheezy. -- Best regards, imacat

Hello (and Problem with bzr)

2010-05-17 Thread imacat
Dear all, Hi. This is imacat from Taiwan. I'm new to this team. I tried to checkout the source, as Rene Engelhard suggested, but failed several times. Sorry I'm not familiar with bzr. The result is below: ima...@rinse tmp/openoffice % bzr co bzr+ssh://bzr.debian.org