Ivo Timmermans wrote:
Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
Here is a patch that creates a myspell-nl package from the "dutch"
source package.
Hm, it doesn't work quite right. Obvious words work ok, but some
inflections, like "vriendjes", won't work. Any idea where
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 01:21:11PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/237974. It would be better to do it this way.
> >
> > Yes, but that bug is over 260 days old and nothing continues to happen.
>
> Yes, but you can send a patch... I once talked with Ivo and he simply
Hi,
Here is a patch that creates a myspell-nl package from the "dutch"
source package.
You need to have dictionaries-common-dev installed to build the package.
I didn't yet add this to the build-dependencies.
Best regards,
Wouter
diff -urN dutch-0.1e.old/debian/control dutch-0.1e/debian/contro
Hi,
Thanks for your elaborate reply.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 03:03:53PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Is there a standard package that I can adapt?
>
> There is a template in CVS. As I wrote in the announcement a long time
> ago which I sent to you too. see Debian CVS.
Ok, that help
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote:
> Would you like to make packages for us? There aren't enough people
> active to do all the requests, and as you can see in the bug tracking
> system, we have many many bugs to fix with a higher priority. And, it
> helps if the packager
Hi,
I created a myspell-nl and openoffice.org-hyphenation-nl by patching the
openoffice.org-dictionaries. A patch is attached against version
20030813-3 of the openoffice.org-dictionaries source.
The word lists and hyphenation patterns were downloaded from
http://borft.student.utwente.nl/openoff
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:02:07PM -0400, James D Strandboge wrote:
> Woody ships with freetype 2.0.9 while my gnome2.2 backport uses freetype
> 2.1.3. After some investigation and testing, I have found that gnome
> 2.2 does not actually require freetype 2.1.3. Due to people wanting to
> use the
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 01:44:09PM -0500, Michael Schultheiss wrote:
> > deb http://pkedu.fbt.eitn.wau.nl/~wouter/ ./
>
> Would it be possible to add the .dsc, .diff.gz and .orig.tar.gz to
> http://pkedu.fbt.eitn.wau.nl/~wouter/openoffice.org/ ? The other two
> sub-directories have the source + b
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 04:25:01PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> Hi List
>
> I do apt-get install openoffice.org and I get:
>
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> openoffice.org: Depends: openoffice.org-bin (> 1.0.1-pre1.0.2) but it is
> not going to be installed
Are yo
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:17:54AM +0100, Agustin Martin Domingo wrote:
>
> Have you contacted Ivo Timmermans? He is the Debian maintainer of the
> dutch wordlist as well as dutch ispell and aspell dictionaries.
Not yet, thanks for the tip.
However, I think the openoffice.org-specific part of th
Following up on my own mails again,
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:52:24PM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> It may take until next wednesday before I have a new set of packages
> available.
It took me a bit longer than planned, but now I have a woody backport
available for download at:
de
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:34:11PM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> Ok, I'm changing that now, and I'll upload the package this afternoon to
> projects.openoffice.nl.
I just uploaded the package, it can be downloaded here:
deb http://projects.openoffice.nl/download/debia
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:17:15PM +0100, Jan Schulz wrote:
> * Wouter Hanegraaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One question about versioning backport packages: My openoffice.org
> > packages now have version 1.0.2-2. Should I change the version number to
> > make it cl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 06:37:48PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Hanegraaff wrote:
> > Some time ago I announced the availability of a dutch spellcheck
> > package. I wonder if this package could be adopted by the debian
> > openoffice team or other d
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:28:14PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote:
> 'debian/rules build' should not do nothing in the current version, but it
> will do nothing if you already built OOo.
I downloaded version 1.0.2-2 from unstable, isn't that the current
version?
> debian/rules build (or buildall if
Hi all,
I'm trying to rebuild openoffice.org for use with libfreetype6 2.1.3
(which in turn is needed for gnome 2.2 in woody).
After about 11 hours of compiling, I get:
build-tree/oo_1.0.2_src/instsetoo/unxlngi4.pro/01/normal/setup -v
-R:/vol/0/openoffice.org-1.0.2/debian/local/rsfile.txt
glibc
Hello list,
Some time ago I announced the availability of a dutch spellcheck
package. I wonder if this package could be adopted by the debian
openoffice team or other debian developers.
The package can be found here:
deb http://projects.openoffice.nl/download/debian/openoffice.org/ ./
deb-src h
welcome.
Best regards,
Wouter Hanegraaff
Ps. I'm not subscribed to this list, so please CC me on replies.
18 matches
Mail list logo
