Rene Engelhard wrote:
> # "whetever the document is" is not true, and the line is too long anyway..
> # experimental version is a given given your Version;: header already, no need
> # to duplicate it in the bug title
> retitle openoffice.org-impress: crashes each time I switch to fulscreen mode
>
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> reassign 471329 openoffice.org
> reassign 465423 openoffice.org
> forcemerge 465423 471329
>
>
Seems to be gone with RC6!
Tested two problematic slides sets without problem. Quite happy ;-)
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb5130720 (LWP 6344)]
0xacbd1ddd in ?? () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/vclcanvas.uno.so
(gdb) bt
#0 0xacbd1ddd in ?? ()
from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/vclcanvas.uno.so
#1 0xacbbed3d in ?? ()
from /usr/lib/openo
VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
> Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>> tag 450712 + upstream
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Eric Valette wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Note: this is an upstream bug as official upstream windows version are
>>
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> tag 450712 + upstream
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Eric Valette wrote:
>
>> Note: this is an upstream bug as official upstream windows version are
>> behaving
>> exactly the same way on the same figures. The annoying point is that chnaging
>> the anschoring tyep on big document
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> VALETTE Eric RD-MAPS-REN wrote:
> [ snip ]
>
> Your subject is bullshit. Do you really think nothing happens?
> After some days of searching we found the cause and the fixed
> package is building.
>
You probably well tested the package
Cannot open a single.doc anymore!!!
This should only happen once
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice: line 250: 4656 Segmentation
fault "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@"
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> reassign 333547 openoffice.org
> tag 333547 + moreinfo
> tag 333547 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Eric Valette wrote:
>
>>I have a document (that I cannot share) where the spellchecker only checks
>>part of the frontpage and says spelling complete when the same d
8 matches
Mail list logo