can I get binary:libixion-0.17-0 is NEW. rejected please? broken tarball.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Rene,
our hardworking trainees added a note to your package:
The paragraph for Rene exists, but has no 'Files:' line.
Another copyright block for some /misc/* files is missing.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rej
Hi Rene,
one of our trainees had a look at your package and found that:
The copyright header of the following files are LGPL-2.1+ only:
src/CMakeLists.txt
tests/comparerenderer/*
tests/featuremap/*
tests/nametabletest/*
tests/segcache/*
tests/graphite.py
The copyright
Hi Rene,
one of our trainees left a note at your package, that according to the file
header, several files are licensed under "LGPL-2.1+, or MPL or GPL-2+".
Please mention them in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand
Hi Rene,
please take care of:
W: libreoffice-dictionaries source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
(empty field, paragraph at line 44)
W: libreoffice-dictionaries source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
(empty field, paragraph at line 52)
W: libreoffice-dictionaries source
as requested on irc ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
as requested on irc ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
as requested on irc
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
8 matches
Mail list logo