Hi,
I am trying to register an extension for Libreoffice. I unzipped the *.oxt-file
under /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/, but it seems not to be
recognized. Do I need to register the extension somehow or is Libreoffice
supposed to pick up all the extensions in this folder automatically? Ho
Hello,
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 22.01.2014, 10:09 +0100:
>> In the last discussion
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2013/08/msg00167.html
>> it was said that Debian should not include the pom.xml's since upstream
>> doesn't
>> ship them either. I talked with the upstream developer o
Dear maintainers,
a while ago I brought up this topic already and I would like to re-open the
discussion again. I want to suggest that libreoffice-java-common ships Maven
meta information (pom.xml's) for its jar files.
Every package which uses Maven must in turn have all its Maven dependencies
av
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 10.08.2013, 22:36 +0200:
>Will try. A step-by-step instruction for safety-proofness would be nice
>nevertheless...
First of all, generate your three poms and place those somewhere in the source.
Run mh_lspoms and answer the questions. It'll generate a *.poms-file. Rename
t
Hello Rene,
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 10.08.2013, 22:36 +0200:
>On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:10:19PM +0200, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
>> >But sorry, but I am maven-agnostic. How do I put it where? just a juh.pom?
>> >And just call mh_lspoms?
>> I'm also not a exper
Hello,
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 10.08.2013, 18:15 +0200:
>On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:43:14AM +0200, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
>> I am packaging a Libreoffice extension using maven as the build utility. For
[...]
>> There are already POM files from a developer availabl
Hello,
I am packaging a Libreoffice extension using maven as the build utility. For
maven, every jar file has to be registered in the Debian-specificc maven
repository, located at /usr/share/maven-repo. I would ask for integration of
POM-files (the maven meta information) to allow Libreoffice plug
Hi,
in my package accessodf there is a bug which leaves unowned files behind after a
purge, see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679717
After applying the latest patch, the file
/usr/lib/ure/share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml is left behind. I had
the idea to remove this
Hello Rene,
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 15.08.2012, 9:19 +0200:
>On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:44:08PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> BUT better (and this is what almost all extensions INCLUDING voikko do since
>> lng before you packaged this)
>> is to unpack the extension into /usr/lib/libreof
Hello,
unopkg has side-effects when removing an extension (it leaves files behind)
which is a violation of the policy. In a extension of LibreOffice (AccessODF)
this leads to a bug (Bug#679717,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679717). It was suggested that
I should have a look in
Hello René,
Rene Engelhard wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:33:24PM +0200:
>> asking because I need to know whether my package should have
>> Libreoffice-calc as
>> a dependency.
>
>Whenever I upload it. There's the changelog :)
>(If this was a bug I could close it, but it isn't...)
>
>> >rene@f
Hello René
Rene Engelhard wrote on So, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:59:20 +0200:
>On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 12:31:33PM +0200, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
>> I'm currently trying to package a Libreoffice extension, which requires
>> libreoffice-writer. However, in order to r
Hello,
I'm currently trying to package a Libreoffice extension, which requires
libreoffice-writer. However, in order to run it needs the file
"vbaeventsli.uno.so" which is in the package libreoffice-calc. So my question is
(since this file doesn't belong really to calc) whether it shouldn't be mov
13 matches
Mail list logo
