flute-openoffice.org_1.3.0-OOo31-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

openoffice.org-dictionaries_2.4.0~m240-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

As requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Comments regarding openoffice.org_2.3.0.dfsg-2_amd64.changes

W: openoffice.org-l10n-ar: old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

openoffice.org_2.0.4~m181-1_source+i386+all.changes REJECTED

As requested === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#363138: openoffice.org: useless message while starting

On 10627 March 1977, Martin Kretzschmar wrote: >> If you start OOo in a chroot without /proc mounted you get a >> --- Warning - OO.o will not work without a mounted /proc filesystem --- >> Why? That doesnt make sense as OOo works fine without it. > IIRC OOo uses (at least 1.1 did) /proc to get its

Bug#363138: openoffice.org: useless message while starting

Package: openoffice.org Severity: minor If you start OOo in a chroot without /proc mounted you get a --- Warning - OO.o will not work without a mounted /proc filesystem --- Why? That doesnt make sense as OOo works fine without it. -- bye Joerg > 16. What should you do if a security bug is disc