Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.2-3+2
Severity: minor
Hello,
If I want to see a OOo file, I type 'see file.sdw'. The first time I do so,
the call blocks but if I have OOo open, it returns. This is inconsistent,
please settle for one version of this.
Nice greetings, Jan
-- Syst
Hallo!
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disabled 'Add a printer' option in padmin when CUPS is used, closes #251888
So I can't add kprinter in the dialog? How will I do my nice stuff,
which I can do there?
Jan
Hallo!
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe this is related to the fact that I do not set LC_ALL on my system,
>> because I want LC_MESSAGES=C.
> This IMHO is no bug. IMHO It is right to use LC_MESSAGES. Every one program
> (gcc, etc.) switch their _messages_ according to LC_MESSA
Hallo!
* Martin Kretzschmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Am Do, den 01.04.2004 schrieb Andreas Rittershofer um 12:13:
>> The language setting is without any effect. I set it to german, but OO
>> remains english.
> $ apt-get install openoffice.org-l10n-de
I also had to remove the engli
Hello,
It shows the right language version, when I remove the english l10n
package. I had both (de and en) installed.
Jan
--
Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."
Hallo!
It's still the same with teh experimental version of OOo related packages.
Jan
--
Jan Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Wer nicht fragt, bleibt dumm."
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.0+1.1.1a-1+1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: experimental
Not really a problem yet, but with the next version of kde 3.2, the OOo menu
entries are shown twice in the KDE menu: Once as Menu|Openoffice.org
1.1.1a|... and once as Menu|Office|...
IMO, they s
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.1.0+1.1.1a-1+1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
Console says it all:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/backup$ ooffice
OpenOffice.org for Debian - see /usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/README.Debian.gz
openoffice.org: You have no entry for OpenOffice.org 1.1.1
Package: oooqs-kde
Version: 2.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
I upgraded my OOo package to the ones in experimental and wanted to start
OOo by using the kde quickstarter. It came up with the setup programm
instead of OOo. As the wrapper upgrades that automagically, the QS should do
the s
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1.1.0-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Hello,
When I start OOo on my system, the user interface is in english. My current
locale settings is like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ locale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LC_CTYPE="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
LC_NUMERIC="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
LC_TIME="[
Hallo!
I can't bring OOo to show german menus. I remember, that this was
possible some time ago.
It seems that the wrapper does all the nessesary things to enable
german locales (layer file has de-DE, all locale environment variables
in /usr/bin/openoffice are set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and the pa
Hallo!
* Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * x-ttcidfont-conf: Makes all defoma-registered fonts on your system
> available to OpenOffice.org
Is that still right with the latest fontconfig patches?
Jan
Hallo!
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.openoffice, you wrote:
> Notice that I never said "OpenOffie.org 1.1.0", I said "OpenOffice". :)
Sorry, that wasn't against your wording, but its also something which
looks bad in the kde menu: I have
...
Internet
Multimedia
Openoffice 1.1.0
Programme
Spiele
..
Hallo!
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.openoffice, you wrote:
>OpenOffice should have its own OpenOffice.org folder in the Gnome
>menu, just like KDE menus have; it should not put its menu entries in
>the generic Office folder used by the Gnome Office (AbiWord, Gnumeric,
>etc.) applications.
I'm actu
Hallo!
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Schulz wrote:
>> Does anyone knows how to get slrn to recognise mime postings?
> use mutt? :)
:/ I do that with all the ML I use more frequently. For all the rest
news.gmane is really fine. I once saw a macro for this, b
Hallo!
Does anyone knows how to get slrn to recognise mime postings?
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I had to remove even more icons, because they were present in my
>> system. I final made a find ./debian/ -name "*.xpm" and removed all
>> found icons (all available from /usr/share
Hallo!
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> huh? why? there is no hicolor in 16x16 for ooo_global.xpm in
> oooqs-kde..
> At least letting remove it in rules after reading your suggestion
> failed because rm could not find the file. That's a strong indication
> it is not there :-)
I had t
Hallo!
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> /usr/bin/openoffice: line 251: /soffice: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
>> gefunden
> Not sure why you get that.
Habe a look at the if/else thingy starting in line 185
if can_upgrade; then # Upgrader started
[no OOHOME set]
else # Normal Startup
Hallo!
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [..] try them out, you can grab them for i386 from:
> http://people.debian.org/~halls/openoffice/1.1rc
Some comments:
[after apt-get install ooo]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ openoffice
OpenOffice.org for Debian - see
/usr/share/doc/openoffice.org/R
Hallo!
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Shit :( Can you tell me the file? I will then use a rebuild version,
>> which I will modify (if I'm able to...) Q&D...
> /usr/share/icons/locolor/16x16/apps/ooo_global.xpm is now in
> openoffice.org so it should be removed from oooqs-kde.
Than
Hallo!
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>them out, you can grab them for i386 from:
> http://people.debian.org/~halls/openoffice/1.1rc
BTW: Could you please mention the drawbacks with using prelink? If
there is such a question and I just here something will be better, I
will alwa
Hallo!
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oooqs-kde has a file conflict with the newer openoffice.org. Therefore
> the conflicts:
Shit :( Can you tell me the file? I will then use a rebuild version,
which I will modify (if I'm able to...) Q&D...
[RC Bug]
I re-read the bugreport and i
Hallo!
* Chris Halls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>them out, you can grab them for i386 from:
> http://people.debian.org/~halls/openoffice/1.1rc
Very nice! And it is even installable with my 'enchanced' woody. :)
Only thing:
|The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| openoffice.
Hallo!
Yesterday I started my second try to build OOo from source.
Unfortunatelly it again failed with this error:
--8<-:- snip -:-8<-:- snip -:-8<--
/usr/bin/ar rv uconvmsg/libuconvmsg.a uconvmsg/uconvmsg_dat.o
a - uconvmsg/uconvmsg_dat.o
Inconsistency detected by
you wrote:
> I cannot reporoduce that...
Just a 'me too' message: I remember having that with the
'pre official' deb as well. Shortly afterwards my SO broke.
Thats already a long time off, so I can't say, what was wrong or
what I did during that time to make it happen...
Jan
Hello,
I have no idea what happe4nd, but as I tried today to start OOo,
simply nothing happend. CPU went up for a second and I found a few
prozesses when ps'ing, but no window apeared.
When I remove the .sversionrc and my old .ooo, I get a segmention
fault. When tring the mentioned things in READ
Hello,
Sorry, not really a help, but just some comments...
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason why my openoffice crashes almost every time I try to save or
> print (or do most things)?
> The only thing that is reliable is command line printing with -p
> (not that that has much re
* Wouter Hanegraaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It took me a bit longer than planned, but now I have a woody backport
> available for download at:
Thanks a lot!
With me, somewhere after an hour, the build crashed with an error :(
Haven't tried ater that.
> The packages work for me (tm), I built
* Wouter Hanegraaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One question about versioning backport packages: My openoffice.org
> packages now have version 1.0.2-2. Should I change the version number to
> make it clear that this version was a backport to woody (with new
> freetype)?
That sounds like you inten
29 matches
Mail list logo
