Bug#690066: Bug really RC?

severity 690066 important thanks I don't think this bug is release critical. The right severity, for me, seems to be "important". OK, one could argue about "dataloss" but someone opening a file created in a format that is not native to LO, then modifying the file, then saving it.should not ye

Bug#667947: [INTL:pl] Polish debconf translation

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:55:03PM +0200, Michał Kułach wrote: > > Package: ooo-build-extensions > [...] > > Please add the attached Polish debconf translation. > > No, this package is so obviously dead right now that I wonder why people > don't notice.

Bug#658536: Announce of the upcoming NMU for the ooo-build-extensions package

Dear maintainer of ooo-build-extensions and Debian translators, Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the ooo-build-extensions Debian package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS. I announced the intent to build and possibly upload a

Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of ooo-build-extensions to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Dear Debian maintainer, ("oh no, not him again"...) The ooo-build-extensions Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes for po-debconf, namely bug number 658536 (and maybe other similar bugs). So, sorry for this, but the

Cancelling l10n upload of writer2latex to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:49:41PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > I wonder whether the debian/po directory might actually be a leftover > > from versions that were using debconf. > > > > René? > > Yes, it is. O

Re: Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of writer2latex to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Quoting Jeroen Schot (sc...@a-eskwadraat.nl): > Hi, > > So far I have refrained from translating the writer2latex templates to > Dutch because it is flagged as having errors. > > : > > writer2latex 1.0.2-6 [Debian Li

Exploring the possibility of an l10n upload of writer2latex to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

Dear Debian maintainer, ("oh no, not him again"...) The writer2latex Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes for po-debconf, namely bug number 619659 (and maybe other similar bugs). So, sorry for this, but the radar be

Re: [RFR] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > _Description: Component registries might be corrupted > You are upgrading from a version which might have corrupted > service/component registry files (*.rdb). > . > Especially /var/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/services.rdb and the rdbs > below /

Bug#554713: [INTL:es] Spanish debconf template translation for openoffice.org

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > > btw, I already included files with CR+LF in debian/po for some > > packages without much harm. > > podebconf-display-po gave weird results here, which got fixed by dos2unix'ing > the file... It's probably more a bug (or limitation) in podebconf-displ

Reminder for openoffice.org translation updates

This is a reminder for the running translation round for debconf templates of openoffice.org. Currently complete languages: ar cs es eu fi fr gl ja pt sv Currently existing but incomplete languages: de ru tr Please send out updates before Tuesday, November 10, 2009. (actually, René, who mainta

Bug#554374: openoffice.org: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation update

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > tag 554374 + pending > thanks > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:00:29AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the > > debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors.

Bug#554374: openoffice.org: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation update

Package: openoffice.org Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find attached the french debconf templates update, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. Thanks for taking care of warning translators before uploading a new version with string changes. It's

Bug#552703: [INTL:eu] Openoffice.org debconf templates Basque translation

Quoting Piarres Beobide (pi+deb...@beobide.net): > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 1:3.1.1-5 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch > > Hi > > Attached Openoffice.org debconf templates Basque translation, please add it. That was based on the version of templates that included a typo. Fixed

Bug#552381: openoffice.org: [l10n] Arabic translation

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:08:38AM +0300, Ossama Khayat wrote: > > Arabic translation of package > > This is based on the old templates, and so is obsolete. Please Are you sure, René? From what I see the ar.po file is OK when resynced with the new te

Bug#552327: [l10n:cs] Initial Czech translation PO debconf template for package openoffice.org

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:43:45PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > A review happened in the meantime and slightly changed templates. > > Huh? He already sent it based on the new templates.. Well, the one with the typo..:-) Fixe

Bug#552327: [l10n:cs] Initial Czech translation PO debconf template for package openoffice.org

Quoting Michal Simunek (michal.simu...@gmail.com): > Package: openoffice.org > Version: 1:3.1.1-6 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n, patch > > In attachment there is initial Czech translation PO debconf template > (cs.po) for package openoffice.org, please include it. A review happened in the mea

Bug#552370: openoffice.org: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review

Package: openoffice.org Version: N/A Severity: normal Tags: patch Dear Debian maintainer, On Sunday, October 25, 2009, I notified you of the beginning of a review process concerning debconf templates for openoffice.org. The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates, and

Re: [LCFC] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > Will there be? Or should/can I just "silently" add them without bug and run > podebconf-report-po? ;) Yes, there will be one. And then the call for translations. However, I was away for the week-end, so I'm a bit lagging on my schedule. signature.a

[LCFC] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}

This is the last call for comments for the review of debconf templates for openoffice.org. The reviewed templates will be sent on Thursday, October 22, 2009 to the package maintainer as a bug report and a mail will be sent to this list with "[BTS]" as a subject tag. -- Template: openoffice.or

Re: [RFR] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}

Quoting Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org): > No. This package is about "languages spoken in India". That Bengali > is also spoken in Bangladesh is true, but not in the scope of this > package which from the beginning only was intended to install all l10ns > for packages spoken *in India*. I don't

Re: [RFR] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}

Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk): > > That was not the intention. It a metapackage for "languages spoken > > in India". I don't care about what their script is or whether it's > > actually a "Indic language" from language definition. > > Oh, and openoffice.org-l10n-bn is included for the

Please consider interacting with translators when introducing/modifying new debconf templates

Hello René and other OOo maintainers... I just noticed new or modified debconf templates appearing for this package (special note for you in this standard template: "and I'm admirative of your work"). I would like to suggest you to consider calling for debconf templates review AND translation upd

[RFR] templates://openoffice.org/{templates}

Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for the openoffice.org source package. This review will last from Friday, October 09, 2009 to Monday, October 19, 2009. Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original files. Comments about your proposed

Bug#504323: Bug unreproducible here too

I couldn't reproduce any crash here either, on a fresh install of lenny (in French, which is even more likely to fit the bug submitter's environment) during my tests of D-I. Here again, I really se no reason for the bug to be release critical as it has been proven that it seems to happen only on t

Bug#504604: This bug is anything but release critical

severity 504604 normal thanks The "data loss" rationale in this bug report is fairly weak. The offending file (which you even didn't send to the bug report) is not destroyed nor lost. I'm not the package maintainer but, from the bug discussion, I don't think this bugs deserves to be release crit

Bug#390652: Force merge in two OOo bugs

forcemerge 390136 390652 thanks I've been hit by that one as many people I guess and, while seeking in the BTS for reported bugs, I went on #390652 which failed to be merged appropriately...at least from what I see in the BTS. So, just in case...:-=) -- signature.asc Description: Digital s

Bug#381099: New openoffice.org-help-xx packages. Please include them in tasksel tasks

Package: tasksel Version: 2.53 Severity: wishlist The following openoffice.org-help-* packages recently appeared and should be included in the relevant language-desktop tasks: openoffice.org-help-bg: bulgarian-desktop openoffice.org-help-km: khmer-desktop openoffice.org-help-mk: macedonian-deskto

Fonts packages maintenance team (second) proposal

(this mail is BCC'ed to many font packages maintainers, please respect the Reply-To field) After the initial proposal which I submitted a few days ago (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/02/msg00694.html), a small thread occurred on debian-devel which raised a few topics from my initial mai

Re: openoffice.org-l10n-ar: Package installable...but does nothing

Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: openoffice.org-l10n-ar > Version: 1.1.3-9 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > This package, as well as all -l10n-* packages built for 1.1 versions are > actually mostly useless. They cu

openoffice.org-l10n-ar: Package installable...but does nothing

Package: openoffice.org-l10n-ar Version: 1.1.3-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package, as well as all -l10n-* packages built for 1.1 versions are actually mostly useless. They currently conflict with "openoffice.org" but removing this package leaves all OO binary pa

Bug#283923: More details about this bug

An IRC conversation with Chris Halls had him suggest that #283923 could indeed be #172339. I foudn a similar problem during an install with the Japanese language. I attach the relevant parts of the base-config.log. It seems there that a dependency cycle between gs, gs-gpl and gs-common triggers t

Bug#283923: openoffice.org-bin: Some OpenOffice packages fails to install properly during a fully automated install

> This bugs has been experienced (and may be reproduced) with an automated > install I did today with a test machine. The exact same bug has been experienced on a Spanish install as well last night, on the same box which runs fully automated localized installs. Configurando myspell-es (1.7-26) .

Bug#283923: openoffice.org-bin: Some OpenOffice packages fails to install properly during a fully automated install

(Italian l10n list CC'ed...as this seems related to the localisation somewhere) Quoting Chris Halls ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:35 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > This bugs has been experienced (and may be reproduced) with an automated > > install I d

Bug#283923: openoffice.org-bin: Some OpenOffice packages fails to install properly during a fully automated install

Package: openoffice.org-bin Version: 1.1.2dfsg1-3 Severity: important This bugs has been experienced (and may be reproduced) with an automated install I did today with a test machine. This was a fresh install of a system, in Italian language, with D-I RC2. The install includes installing the desk

Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed

Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > reassign 281645 openoffice.org-bin > retitle 281645 are l10n packages not ready for sarge? > thanks > > From debian-boot discussion, OOo l10n-* packages won't be installed by > tasksel. OOo team, could you care about this? Some will probably say that I'

Bug#265852: openoffice.org-mimelnk: Could not upgrade to latest release because of file conflicting

Package: openoffice.org-mimelnk Version: 1.1.2-3 Severity: important I hope this hasn't already been reported...IF so, sorry for this : I found no trace in the BTS but did not check deeply, though. I prefer reporting than ignoring...we're in a release process, after all..:-) Unpacking replacemen

Bug#208841: Bug "pending", upload yesterday, bug not closed-->?

This bugs is tagged "pending" with René indicating that the "next upload" would close it. So far, an upload appeared yesterday in Debian archives, but the tmeplates are not translated to french. On the other hand, the changelog seems to indicate that the templates were modifiedMichel, I guess

Bug#170044: Bug solved by latest upload

The bug does not happen anymor esince I upgraded to 1.0.1-6. I guess you may close it. Thanks for the good work. -- Christian Perrier Debian geneweb and lifelines packages maintainer

Bug#170044: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error"

Quoting Chris Halls ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Anyway, I started suspecting the shared library loader and found a > workaround on my system. Please will you try setting LD_BIND_NOW and see if > it works for you too? > > i.e. > > $ LD_BIND_NOW=1 openoffice Well, now it crashes considerably quicker

Bug#170044: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error"

Quoting Chris Halls ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error: > > /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so: symbol _ZN3psp10PrinterGfxC1Ev, > > version LIBPSPRI

Bug#170044: openoffice.org: All OO programs crash with "relocation error"

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.1-5.6rc1 Severity: important Tags: sid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ooffice Gnome session manager detected - session management disabled /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: relocation error: /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl641li.so: symbol _ZN3psp10PrinterGfxC1