Re: Scripting OpenOffice?

2002-11-23 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:59:16PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in writing an automated word-to-PostScript converter. > OpenOffice is well capable of opening Word documents, and of printing to > PostScript and even comes with some "simple" examples of doing some of this. >

PyUNO, scripting oo with python, anyone interested?

2002-07-30 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
I saw this nice package called PyUNO at http://polysorbate.org/?work/pyuno (I am quoting:) PyUNO is a Python module that allows you to use OpenOffice.org's UNO objects as if they were Python objects. The licence is LGPL. I wonder if anyone else on this list migth be interested in PyUNO. What

Re: building langpack debs? - ok now

2002-07-28 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
Well the langpacks are built in 1.0.1-3 now and I can see them in the control file (something that must have changed between 1.0.1-1 and 1.0.1-3 and I didn't notice) Everything is running fine now. Thanks again, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: building langpack debs?

2002-07-26 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:52:28AM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: ... > You can also generate a single package with the command: > >fakeroot debian/rules binary- > > e.g. fakeroot debian/rules binary-openoffice.org-l10n-en > > will generate a specific .deb. But normally you should have generat

building langpack debs?

2002-07-25 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
Hi, How do I actually build one of the language packs as a .deb package openoffice.org-l10n-en.deb ...-de.deb etc. (or at least install one of them from src)? I have so far successfully built the oo binaries openoffice.org-bin_1.0.1-1_i386.deb openoffice.org_1.0.1-1_all.deb by (1) apt

Re: building -rc3 now

2002-07-13 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 07:14:33AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: ... > kill this patch, it is included by upstream in 1.0.1 :) > > and try again! > Jan ... Yes, removing this patch solved the problem. There where two more patches I had to remove, too. These are - as it seems to me - all

pre1.0.1rc3, problem with patches now

2002-07-12 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:58:14PM +0200, Chris Halls wrote: > Whoops, sorry. And I forgot to generate the source package for -rc3. > Uploading now. Thank you. The build with -rc2 (that I had started before) went fine, creating two debs oo.org-bin_i386 and oo.org_all (could not install them tho

building now

2002-07-11 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:41:24AM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote: > >Do a chmod u+x debian/rules > > yes that was it, building now, thanks. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: unstable, apt-get source, MD5Sum mismatch, next problem

2002-07-11 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:29:18AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: ... > > $ tar xfvz openoffice.org_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz > $ zcat openoffice.org_1.0.0-pre1.0.1rc2.diff.gz | patch -p0 > > Chris, can you fix the error? ... Yes, that worked, thanks. Next problem, however: mousehouse:~/openoffice.org-1

unstable, apt-get source, MD5Sum mismatch

2002-07-11 Thread Andreas Reuleaux
Hi, trying to build on sid (i386): # vpn-junkies deb http://openoffice.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main contrib deb-src http://openoffice.vpn-junkies.de/openoffice unstable main contrib (apt-get update) mousehouse:~# apt-get source openoffice.org ... Failed to fetch http://openof