Bug#1054239: libixion FTBFS with gcc 13 on i386

2023-10-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libixion Version: 0.17.0-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs trixie sid patch https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libixion&arch=i386&ver=0.19.0-1&stamp=1697292545&raw=0 ... FAIL: document-test === test_basic_calc: --begin document-test: document_test.cpp:50: void t

Bug#1024157: libreoffice/experimental FTBFS with dragonbox 1.1.3

2022-11-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libreoffice Version: 1:7.4.3~rc1-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Control: close -1 1:7.4.2-4 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=ppc64el&ver=1%3A7.4.3%7Erc1-2&stamp=1668227063&raw=0 ... checking which dragonbox to use... external checking for dragonbox/dragonbo

Bug#964954: writer2latex should depend on default-jre | java6-runtime

2020-07-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: writer2latex Version: 1.4-8 Severity: important Depends: java6-runtime, ... Depending on a virtual package offers the package manager all providers as equal choice. Depends: default-jre | java6-runtime gives a default choice that will be preferred by package managers, while still permitt

Bug#917686: lightproof: FTBFS: warning [/<>/lightproof_ru_RU-0.3.4.oxt]: zipfile is empty

2019-01-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 04:11:29PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > retitle 917686 lightproof: FTBFS: "zipfile is empty" with python 3.7 ("Key > Error") > thanks > > Hi, > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 12:37:55PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:43:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum

Bug#919968: libreoffice: binary-all FTBFS

2019-01-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libreoffice Version: 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=all&ver=1%3A6.1.5~rc1-1&stamp=1547977527&raw=0 ... [build BIN] ucbhelper S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Module/nonl10n/ && touch $W/Modu

Bug#913051: hsqldb1.8.0 FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2018-11-06 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: hsqldb1.8.0 Version: 1.8.0.10+dfsg-9 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/hsqldb1.8.0.html ... lib: [javac] /build/1st/hsqldb1.8.0-1.8.0.10+dfsg/build/build.xml:351: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to bu

Bug#912270: writer2latex FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2018-10-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: writer2latex Version: 1.4-5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/writer2latex.html ... compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /build/1st/writer2latex-1.4/target/classes [javac] Compiling 203 source files to /build/1st/writer2late

Bug#888930: libgltf FTBFS with libglm-dev 0.9.9~a2-1

2018-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libgltf Version: 0.1.0-2 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libgltf.html ... checking epoxy/gl.h usability... yes checking epoxy/gl.h presence... yes checking for epoxy/gl.h... yes checking glm/glm.hpp usability... yes checking glm/glm.hpp

Bug#888929: libetonyek FTBFS with libglm-dev 0.9.9~a2-1

2018-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libetonyek Version: 0.1.7-2 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libetonyek.html ... In file included from /usr/include/glm/gtx/quaternion.hpp:20:0, from /usr/include/glm/gtx/io.hpp:24, from IWORKTransformat

Re: Bug#869649: Debian 9 i386 - Libreoffice write crash

2017-07-25 Thread Adrian Bunk
reassign 869649 libreoffice-gnome thanks On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:33:33AM +, Alessandro Chiominto wrote: > Package: libreoffice-gnomeVersion: any > The program «libreoffice-writer» crashes at start. If I remove the gnome > integration the program starts with no problems.Here is a transcipts

broffice.org was removed long ago

2016-10-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
broffice.org was last built built ~ 2010, and lenny -> squeeze upgrade problems are no longer relevant today. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said

Bug#653629: libreoffice-writer2xhtml: Package description is very confusing

2011-12-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: libreoffice-writer2xhtml Version: 1.0.2-6 Severity: normal <-- snip --> Description: Writer/Calc to XHTML converter extension for LibreOffice Writer2LaTeX is a java utility to convert OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice documents – in particular documents containing formulas – into other for

Bug#642425: ure: javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!

2011-09-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:30:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >... > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:15:03PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > $ /usr/lib/ure/bin/javaldx > > > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! > > > Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common >

Bug#642425: ure: javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment!

2011-09-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: ure Version: 3.4.3-2 Severity: normal <-- snip --> $ rm -rf .libreoffice $ libreoffice javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! Please ensure that a JVM and the package libreoffice-java-common is installed. If it is already installed then try removing ~/.libreoffice/3/use

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-08-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:13:14PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi René, > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:22:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Anyway, I'll fix this but I am not convinced that we should move from > > > SSl to Gnutls (except for curl which must

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-08-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:13:14PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi René, > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:22:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Anyway, I'll fix this but I am not convinced that we should move from > > > SSl to Gnutls (except for curl which must

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-06-23 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:42:16AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi René, > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > No idea why it does not result in a dependency on amd64/i386, but... > > > > On architectures other than i386/amd64 the build log says: > > dpkg-

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-06-23 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:59:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, Hi René, > Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > - No OOo package seems to have a direct dependency against OpenSSL. > > > > What do I miss here? > > That the build of the webdav ucp does a explicit

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-06-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:06:11PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >... > If you would have looked at OOos changelog, you would have seen that using > the OpenSSL version was deliberate: > > openoffice.org (1:2.4.0~ooh680m5-1) experimental; urgency=high > [...] > * debian/rules: > - build again

Bug#534243: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libneon27-gnutls

2009-06-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org-core Version: 1:3.1.0-5 Severity: wishlist openoffice.org-core uses libneon27, which is linked with OpenSSL. Looking at the licences this seems to be OK. But other (GPL'ed) applications mistakenly linked with libneon27 instead of libneon27-gnutls are a source of GPL viola

Bug#464754: openoffice.org: please switch to libdb4.6

2008-02-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1:2.3.1-4 Severity: wishlist Please switch from libdb4.5 to the more recent libdb4.6. TIA Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#431786: openoffice.org-core: please switch to libdb4.5

2007-07-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org-core Version: 2.2.1-4 Severity: wishlist Please switch from libdb4.4 to the more recent libdb4.5. TIA Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#391671: openoffice.org: Please switch to libcurl3-gnutls

2006-10-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.4~rc3-1 Severity: wishlist Please switch from libcurl3 to libcurl3-gnutls. OO works for me with libcurl3-gnutls without any problems, and it would be one less package depending on libcurl3 (that implied some licence problems for some packages due to the OpenS

Bug#386763: openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0: installation fails

2006-09-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0 Version: 2.0.4~rc1-1 Severity: grave # apt-get install openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: openoffice.org-dtd-officedocument1.0 0 upgraded,

Bug#341649: openoffice.org-core: Please switch to libdb4.3

2005-12-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org-core Version: 2.0.0-3 Severity: wishlist Can you switch from libdb4.2 to the more recent libdb4.3? TIA Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335313: openoffice.org: MIME type entries stillrefer to the *2 programs

2005-10-23 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: normal <-- snip --> > cat /usr/lib/mime/packages/openoffice.org-writer application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text; oowriter2 '%s'; edit=oowriter2 '%s'; test=test "$DISPLAY" != "" ;description="OpenDocument Text"; nametemplate=%.odt ... <-- snip

Bug#322083: openoffice.org-bin: Please switch to libxaw8

2005-08-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:51:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >... > Hi, Hi Rene, > Am Dienstag, 9. August 2005 01:55 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > > Can you switch from libxaw7 to the more recent libxaw8? > > Is there a real reason for this except it being more recent? no, th

Bug#198694: Why don't you compile OO with -O2 on i386?

2005-08-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi René, I compiled 1.1.4-5 with -O2 as described in this bug, and it the resulting OO seems to work fine. Was there a specific reason why you dropped the plan to make this change in the OO packages? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of

Bug#322083: openoffice.org-bin: Please switch to libxaw8

2005-08-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org-bin Version: 1.1.4-5 Severity: wishlist Can you switch from libxaw7 to the more recent libxaw8? TIA Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Status of OO 1.0.3-3?

2003-07-05 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, what's the status of OO 1.0.3-3 (or 1.0.3.1-1)? Could you upload a new OO package with all the fixes that are already in the BTS to unstable? TIA Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days

Bug#198694: openoffice.org: Please compile with -O2 on i386

2003-06-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch After looking at solenv/inc/unxlngi4.mk and solenv/inc/unxlngppc4.mk it seems you compile OO on powerpc with -O2 but on i386 only with -O1? I tried to compile the 1.0.3-2 with gcc 3.2.3 and the patch below. It compiled fine a

Bug#195359: openoffice.org: Doesn't build with gcc 3.2.3 and libstdc++5 3.3-2

2003-06-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
>... > Hi Adrian, Hi Rene, > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > openoffice.org doesn't build with gcc 3.2.3 and libstdc++5 3.3-2 (e.g. > > with the g++-3.2 and libstdc++5 currently in unstable and testing): > > Known. > > [ snip ] > > dmake: Error code 1, whi

Bug#195359: openoffice.org: Doesn't build with gcc 3.2.3 and libstdc++5 3.3-2

2003-05-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: normal openoffice.org doesn't build with gcc 3.2.3 and libstdc++5 3.3-2 (e.g. with the g++-3.2 and libstdc++5 currently in unstable and testing): <-- snip --> ... rm -f ../unxlngi4.pro/bin/udk3.0.1/linux/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 cp -p /home/bunk/Pak

Bug#186820: openoffice .desktop files (fwd)

2003-03-30 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: wishlist I don't use GNOME. Please comment on whether Charles' suggestion is resonable. - Forwarded message from Charles Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Charles Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: openoffice .desktop files

Re: OO 1.0.2 backported to woody

2003-02-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:52:49AM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > Hi Adrian, Hi Chris, > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:15:22AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I've backported OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 to woody and added these packages > > to a larger collection of packages I do

Bug#180132: openoffice.org: Icon in /usr/share/gnome/apps/net/.directory is wrong

2003-02-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: normal Klaus-M. Klingsporn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> noted that "Icon" at the end of /usr/share/gnome/apps/net/.directory is wrong, it contains the path of the build tree. The result of this bug is that the Icon isn't displayed in the Gnome menu. cu

OO 1.0.2 backported to woody

2003-01-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
FYI: I've backported OpenOffice.org 1.0.2 to woody and added these packages to a larger collection of packages I do maintain [1]. Notes regarding these packages: - they are compiled using a backported gcc 3.2.1 - as a workaround for the problem with the same file in several packages each open