Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 985401 dpkg
Bug #985401 [libreoffice-common] dpkg: libreoffice buster->bullseye upgrade
failures
Bug reassigned from package 'libreoffice-common' to 'dpkg'.
No longer marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:7.0.4-3.
Ignoring request to
reassign 985401 dpkg
thanks
Hi Guillem,
Am 18.03.21 um 00:02 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> Control: reassign -1 libreoffice-common 1:7.0.4-3
It would be helpful if you actually did your homework. There already was
985297 so you now caused a bogus addditional RC bug.
That bug even was marked as blo
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libreoffice-common 1:7.0.4-3
Bug #985401 [dpkg] dpkg: libreoffice buster->bullseye upgrade failures
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'libreoffice-common'.
No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.20.7.1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions o
Control: reassign -1 libreoffice-common 1:7.0.4-3
[ Leaving all context for the reassign. ]
Hi!
On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 12:13:52 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.20.7.1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
> Control: block 985297 wi
Hi,
Am 16.03.21 um 22:02 schrieb Adi Kriegisch:
> thank you very much for the hard work you've put in packaging libreoffice
> online. Starting from your salsa repo[1] I was able to successfully build
> loolwsd and loleaflet packages with the libreoffice packages from
> buster-backports. There were
Processing control commands:
> block 985297 with -1
Bug #985297 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: do not use dir_to_symlink
for /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/registry
985297 was not blocked by any bugs.
985297 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 985297: 985401
--
985297: htt
6 matches
Mail list logo
