2018-09-07 23:44:08 +0200, Rene Engelhard:
[...]
> I don't buy this: The autopkgtest of exactly the version you report it
> against:
[...]
Hi Rene,
I can reproduce on a different system. The evidences can also be
found in the source:
See
https://sources.debian.org/src/libnumbertext/1.0-2/debian
tag 908237 + moreinfo
tag 908237 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:44:08PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Also:
> >
> > $ /usr/lib/libnumbertext/spellout -l en 101
> > spellout: missing language module
> [...]
>
> I don't buy this: The autopkgtest of exactly the version y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 908237 + moreinfo
Bug #908237 [libnumbertext-tools] libnumbertext-tools: "spellout" is not in
$PATH and looks for data in the wrong places
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #908237 to the same tags previously set
> tag 908237 + unreproduc
tag 908237 + moreinfo
tag 908237 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 05:47:54PM +0100, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> The tool is meant to be invoked by the end user, but is not
> located in a directory in $PATH. I would expect it to go in
> /usr/bin (and have a corresponding man page
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 908237 + moreinfo
Bug #908237 [libnumbertext-tools] libnumbertext-tools: "spellout" is not in
$PATH and looks for data in the wrong places
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> tag 908237 + unreproducible
Bug #908237 [libnumbertext-tools] libnumbertext-to
Package: libnumbertext-tools
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: normal
$ dpkg -L libnumbertext-tools
[...]
/usr/lib/libnumbertext/spellout
The tool is meant to be invoked by the end user, but is not
located in a directory in $PATH. I would expect it to go in
/usr/bin (and have a corresponding man page in
/
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:52:13PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the info, I did not find the relevant part in helper.py.
>
> Maybe because those are handled more "manually" in control.in :)
>
> > There is one package (hunspell-sv) where that is desirable, since it will
> > onl
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 14:38:25 +0200
Source: libreoffice-dictionaries
Binary: libreoffice-lightproof-pt-br myspell-hr myspell-pl myspell-sv-se
hunspell-sv-se hyphen-af hunspell-af mythes-ar hyphen-bg hunspell-bg mythes-bg
libreoffice-dictionaries_6.1.0~rc2-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libreoffice-dictionaries_6.1.0~rc2-3.dsc
libreoffice-dictionaries_6.1.0~rc2-3.debian.tar.xz
libreoffice-dictionaries_6.1.0~rc2-3_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue
Your message dated Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:19:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#908146: fixed in libreoffice-dictionaries 1:6.1.0~rc2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #908146,
regarding libreoffice-dictionaries: Dealing with Breaks/Replaces against
ancient dicts in other myspell/hunspel
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:15:34AM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > Note that if you also look for a home to keep those transitional
> > packages, we can also build them within lo-dicts (we would drop them
> > after buster, which also means after ubuntu 18.04, so everything's
> > great).
Well, of
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 08:58:37PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hi Agustin!
Hi Mattia, thanks for the quick reply,
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> > I have recently received some bug reports about making transitional myspell
> > packages to hunspell packages
12 matches
Mail list logo
