Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 23:50:13 +0200
Source: liborcus
Binary: liborcus-dev liborcus-0.13-0 liborcus-spreadsheet-model-0.13-0
python3-orcus liborcus-doc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.13.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
liborcus_0.13.4-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
liborcus_0.13.4-3.dsc
liborcus_0.13.4-3.debian.tar.xz
liborcus_0.13.4-3_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 07:34:19AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I've not added any specific driver allowance, and if this is for the
> proprietary
> nvidia driver I am not going to do so.
>
> If so, that basically leaves /etc/java-?-openjdk/security/java.security r,
> - which again proves that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 903900 - moreinfo
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] apparmor profile does not allow java.security
access
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity 903900 normal
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] apparmor profile does not allow java.security
access
severity 903900 wishlist
tag 903900 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Nuno Oliveira wrote:
> Package: libreoffice-common
> Version: 1:6.0.6~rc1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> The following seem to be required, to avoid AppArmor from complaining from
> file
> acess:
>
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 903900 wishlist
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] apparmor profile does not allow java.security
access
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> tag 903900 + moreinfo
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] apparmor profile does not allow java.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 903900 apparmor profile does not allow java.security access
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: apparmor denies
java.security access
Changed Bug title to 'apparmor profile does not allow java.security access'
from 'libre
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 903900 libreoffice-common: apparmor denies java.security access
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: missing AppArmor entries
Changed Bug title to 'libreoffice-common: apparmor denies java.security access'
from 'libreoffic
retitle 903900 libreoffice-common: apparmor denies java.security access
severity 903900 - moreinfo
tag 903900 normal
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 09:21:42AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > /etc/java-8-openjdk/security/java.security r,
> ^
> (Almost) valid. Though I wonder why L
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: missing AppArmor entries
Added tag(s) pending.
--
903900: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
severity 903900 minor
tag 903900 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Nuno Oliveira wrote:
> ### Extra:
> /dev/nvidia0 rw,
> /dev/nvidiactl rw,
> /dev/nvidia-modeset rw,
Nvidia. And looks like the proprietary driver.
(I don't use nvidia cards myself, a IRC query makes peopl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 903900 minor
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: missing AppArmor entries
Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal'
> tag 903900 + moreinfo
Bug #903900 [libreoffice-common] libreoffice-common: missing AppArmor entries
Added t
12 matches
Mail list logo
