On 2017-11-28 12:19, intrigeri wrote:
→ In this case, I would argue that we're talking about a corner
case, that only rather advanced users will hit, and I find it sad
that everyone else can't benefit from AppArmor security benefits
due to that, so I'm leaning towards:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:31:18AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > built time, you can either use aa-complain or manually patch the
>
> That's what I didn't want. Didn't want to stick manual aa-* calls into
> the postinst
Ah, I see what you mean.
NAME
aa-complain - set an AppArmor securi
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:19:05AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> (context for pkg-apparmor folks: the last upload of libreoffice to
> sid disabled the AppArmor profile by default due to #882597)
>
> Rene Engelhard:
> > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:33:20PM +0100, Michael Ott wrote:
> >> start libreo
Hi,
(context for pkg-apparmor folks: the last upload of libreoffice to
sid disabled the AppArmor profile by default due to #882597)
Rene Engelhard:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:33:20PM +0100, Michael Ott wrote:
>> start libreoffice with
>> soffice -env:UserInstallation=file:///srv/home/michael/tm
4 matches
Mail list logo
