On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:49:04AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Mon, 2017 Mar 27 11:01+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >
> > The metapackage is supposed to install (mostly) everything.
> >
> > This includes the Java stuff.
> >
> > Think of people wanting to install extensions (which happen to
On Mon, 2017 Mar 27 11:01+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> The metapackage is supposed to install (mostly) everything.
>
> This includes the Java stuff.
>
> Think of people wanting to install extensions (which happen to be
> written in Java more often than I'd like it but it's a fact...).
>
> That i
Hi Rene,
please take care of:
W: libreoffice-dictionaries source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
(empty field, paragraph at line 44)
W: libreoffice-dictionaries source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
(empty field, paragraph at line 52)
W: libreoffice-dictionaries source
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:57:58AM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> What about the hard dependency of "libreoffice" on lo-java-common? This
> package is just a dependency of components that need Java, so it is not
> appropriate for the metapackage.
The metapackage is supposed to install (mos
On Sun, 2017 Mar 26 10:12+0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > Right. I'd like to be able to say, let's not install that package
> > (lo-java-common), and end up with a clean install of LO sans Java
> > stuff.
>
> You can do that right now, too. Just avoid the Java-using modules. You
> already were on
5 matches
Mail list logo
