The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit b5d0b72464efd296f1380376685b671c0de37e47
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Fri Feb 3 06:14:54 2012 +
build with default boost again but add build-dep on g++-4.6 (>= 4.6.2-12)
diff --git a/changelog b/changelo
Hi Peter,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:36:17AM +, peter green wrote:
> Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice
> to be a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in
> before we can claim we have a reasonablly complete port.
>
[...]
>
> This (build-)d
Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice to be
a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in before we
can claim we have a reasonablly complete port.
The reason libreoffice isn't built is because mingw-w64 is not installable.
The reason mingw-w64 is no
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze4
Severity: minor
Hi,
The sort order in the chooser ignores the LC_COLLATE environment
setting. I'm using English (UK) as the language setting in openoffice
itself, and en_GB.UTF-8 by default in my environment. But: I'm using
LC_COLLATE=C to get
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 616011 1.1.1+LibO3.4.5-2
Bug #616011 [libreoffice-wiki-publisher] libreoffice-wiki-publisher: Export
filter cannot be found
Bug Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:3.4.5-2.
> tags 616011 + patch
Bug #616011 [libreoffice-wiki-publisher
found 616011 1.1.1+LibO3.4.5-2
tags 616011 + patch
thanks
On current wheezy, I get the same problem: the exporter is not listed, and
attempting
to use the "send to" feature yields the same result as OP.
How are exporters supposed to be registered ? Can we manually request a
re-registration
of
6 matches
Mail list logo
